A classification tree for the prediction of benign versus malignant disease in patients with small renal masses

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: To develop a classification tree for the preoperative prediction of benign versus malignant disease in patients with small renal masses. Materials and methods: This is a retrospective study including 395 consecutive patients who underwent surgical treatment for a renal mass < 5 cm in maximum diameter between July 1st 2001 and June 30th 2010. A classification tree to predict the risk of having a benign renal mass preoperatively was developed using recursive partitioning analysis for repeated measures outcomes. Age, sex, volume on preoperative imaging, tumor location (central/peripheral), degree of endophytic component (1%-100%), and tumor axis position were used as potential predictors to develop the model. Results: Forty-five patients (11.4%) were found to have a benign mass postoperatively. A classification tree has been developed which can predict the risk of benign disease with an accuracy of 88.9% (95% CI: 85.3 to 91.8). The significant prognostic factors in the classification tree are tumor volume, degree of endophytic component and symptoms at diagnosis. As an example of its utilization, a renal mass with a volume of < 5.67 cm3 that is < 45% endophytic has a 52.6% chance of having benign pathology. Conversely, a renal mass with a volume ≥ 5.67 cm3 that is ≥ 35% endophytic has only a 5.3% possibility of being benign. Conclusions: A classification tree to predict the risk of benign disease in small renal masses has been developed to aid the clinician when deciding on treatment strategies for small renal masses.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)7379-7384
Number of pages6
JournalCanadian Journal of Urology
Volume21
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2014

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Urology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A classification tree for the prediction of benign versus malignant disease in patients with small renal masses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this