A Comparison of a Fiberoptic Stylet and a Bougie as Adjuncts to Direct Laryngoscopy in a Manikin-Simulated Difficult Airway

George Kovacs, J. Adam Law, Chris McCrossin, Mark Vu, Derek Leblanc, Jun Gao

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study objective: We compare the effectiveness of an endotracheal tube introducer ("bougie") with a new fiberoptic stylet as an adjunct to direct laryngoscopy in facilitating simulated difficult tracheal intubation in a manikin. Methods: Inexperienced laryngoscopists were recruited for this randomized, crossover study. After brief training, participants were randomized to first use either the bougie or fiberoptic stylet as an adjunct to direct laryngoscopy for attempted tracheal intubation of a manikin presenting a fixed, simulated, Cormack-Lehane grade IIIA view. Two attempts at tracheal intubation were allowed, each limited to 60 seconds. The participant then crossed over and used the other device. The same procedure was then repeated on a second manikin presenting a simulated Cormack-Lehane grade IIIB view. Primary outcomes were time to tracheal intubation and successful endotracheal tube placement. Results: One hundred three study participants performed a total of 533 tracheal intubations for evaluation. For the Cormack-Lehane grade IIIA view, correct placement of the endotracheal tube was achieved in 101 (98%) of the fiberoptic stylet-facilitated and all 103 (100%) of the bougie-facilitated tracheal intubations. The time to successful tracheal intubation was similar for both devices (difference in mean time 1.8 seconds; 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.5 to 6.1 seconds). In the Cormack-Lehane grade IIIB view manikin, use of the fiberoptic stylet significantly increased success rate (fiberoptic stylet 98% versus bougie 9%), and a trend was observed toward a decrease in the mean time required for successful tracheal intubation compared to the bougie (fiberoptic stylet 31.0 seconds versus bougie 45.6 seconds; difference in mean time -14.6 seconds; 95% CI -31.4 to 2.3 seconds). Conclusion: In a manikin model, with inexperienced clinicians, both the bougie and the fiberoptic stylet were effective in facilitating tracheal intubation of a simulated Cormack-Lehane grade IIIA view. For a Cormack-Lehane IIIB view, the fiberoptic stylet was significantly more effective than the bougie in facilitating tracheal intubation. Because a manikin model eliminates some of the barriers to use of fiberoptics in patients, further validation of fiberoptic stylet use is required in human subjects with normal and difficult airways.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)676-685
Number of pages10
JournalAnnals of Emergency Medicine
Volume50
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2007

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article, that might create any potential conflict of interest. See the Manuscript Submission Agreement in this issue for examples of specific conflicts covered by this statement. The material in this manuscript has not been published elsewhere. Its publication would not represent a conflict of interest. The authors have no relationship with the manufacturer of the fiberoptic stylet used in this study. Funding was partially obtained through a grant from the Division of Medical Education at Dalhousie University. The fiberoptic stylet was purchased with these funds. Chris McCrossin was funded as a medical student through a summer employment position supported by Dalhousie Medical School and based on an application submitted by George Kovacs.

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Emergency Medicine

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Evaluation Study
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Comparison of a Fiberoptic Stylet and a Bougie as Adjuncts to Direct Laryngoscopy in a Manikin-Simulated Difficult Airway'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this