A Pan-Canadian Validation Study for the Detection of EGFR T790M Mutation Using Circulating Tumor DNA From Peripheral Blood

Shamini Selvarajah, Sophie Plante, Marsha Speevak, Andrea Vaags, Darren Hamelinck, Martin Butcher, Elizabeth McCready, Daria Grafodatskaya, Normand Blais, Danh Tran-Thanh, Xiaoduan Weng, Rami Nassabein, Wenda Greer, Ryan N. Walton, Bryan Lo, Doug Demetrick, Stephanie Santos, Bekim Sadikovic, Xiao Zhang, Tong ZhangTara Spence, Tracy Stockley, Harriet Feilotter, Philippe Joubert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Genotyping circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a promising noninvasive clinical tool to identify the EGFR T790M resistance mutation in patients with advanced NSCLC with resistance to EGFR inhibitors. To facilitate standardization and clinical adoption of ctDNA testing across Canada, we developed a 2-phase multicenter study to standardize T790M mutation detection using plasma ctDNA testing. Methods: In phase 1, commercial reference standards were distributed to participating clinical laboratories, to use their existing platforms for mutation detection. Baseline performance characteristics were established using known and blinded engineered plasma samples spiked with predetermined concentrations of T790M, L858R, and exon 19 deletion variants. In phase II, peripheral blood collected from local patients with known EGFR activating mutations and progressing on treatment were assayed for the presence of EGFR variants and concordance with a clinically validated test at the reference laboratory. Results: All laboratories in phase 1 detected the variants at 0.5 % and 5.0 % allele frequencies, with no false positives. In phase 2, the concordance with the reference laboratory for detection of both the primary and resistance mutation was high, with next-generation sequencing and droplet digital polymerase chain reaction exhibiting the best overall concordance. Data also suggested that the ability to detect mutations at clinically relevant limits of detection is generally not platform-specific, but rather impacted by laboratory-specific practices. Conclusions: Discrepancies among sending laboratories using the same assay suggest that laboratory-specific practices may impact performance. In addition, a negative or inconclusive ctDNA test should be followed by tumor testing when possible.

Original languageEnglish
Article number100212
JournalJTO Clinical and Research Reports
Volume2
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Disclosure: Dr. Selvarajah reports receiving commercial research grants and has an advisory role in AstraZeneca Canada. Dr. Joubert reports receiving commercial research grants from Roche , and Biomark Signature Inc., and honoraria from AstraZeneca and Pfizer . Dr. Stockley reports receiving commercial research grants and honoraria and has advisory roles in AstraZeneca Canada . Drs. Feilotter, McCready and Grafodatskaya report receiving commercial research grants from AstraZeneca . Dr. Walton is an employee and owns stocks at AstraZeneca. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Oncology
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Pan-Canadian Validation Study for the Detection of EGFR T790M Mutation Using Circulating Tumor DNA From Peripheral Blood'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this