A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Acetaminophen plus Ibuprofen Versus Acetaminophen plus Codeine plus Caffeine after Outpatient General Surgery

Alex Mitchell, Sander Veldhuyzen van Zanten, Karen Inglis, Geoffrey Porter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

58 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Narcotics are used extensively in outpatient general surgery but are often poorly tolerated with variable efficacy. Acetaminophen combined with NSAIDs is a possible alternative. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of acetaminophen, codeine, and caffeine (Tylenol No. 3) with acetaminophen and ibuprofen for management of pain after outpatient general surgery procedures. Study Design: A double-blind randomized controlled trial was performed in patients undergoing outpatient inguinal/umbilical/ventral hernia repair or laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients were randomized to receive acetaminophen plus codeine plus caffeine (Tylenol No. 3) or acetaminophen plus ibuprofen (AcIBU) 4 times daily for 7 days or until pain-free. Pain intensity, measured four times daily by visual analogue scale, was the primary outcome. Secondary end points included incidence of side effects, patient satisfaction, number of days until patient was pain-free, and use of alternative analgesia. Results: One hundred forty-six patients were randomized (74 Tylenol No. 3 and 72 AcIBU), and 139 (95%) patients completed the study. No significant differences in mean or maximum daily visual analogue scale scores were identified between the 2 groups, except on postoperative day 2, when pain was improved in AcIBU patients (p = 0.025). During the entire week, mean visual analogue scale score was modestly lower in AcIBU patients (p = 0.018). More patients in the AcIBU group, compared with Tylenol No. 3, were satisfied with their analgesia (83% versus 64%, respectively; p = 0.02). There were more side effects with Tylenol No. 3 (57% versus 41%, p = 0.045), and the discontinuation rate was also higher in Tylenol No. 3-treated patients (11% versus 3%, p = 0.044). Conclusions: When compared with Tylenol No. 3, AcIBU was not an inferior analgesic and was associated with fewer side effects and higher patient satisfaction. AcIBU is an effective, low-cost, and safe alternative to codeine-based narcotic analgesia for outpatient general surgery procedures.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)472-479
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the American College of Surgeons
Volume206
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2008

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Supported by Capital District Health Authority grant. Dr Porter and Dr van Zanten are supported by Clinical Research Scholarships of the Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University. MacNeil Pharmaceuticals made an unrestricted research grant to the Dalhousie University Department of Surgery; they were not involved in the study design, methodology, data collection, or analysis. MacNeil Pharmaceuticals were not made aware of the results of the study until it was submitted for peer-review presentation.

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Acetaminophen plus Ibuprofen Versus Acetaminophen plus Codeine plus Caffeine after Outpatient General Surgery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this