TY - JOUR
T1 - A randomized, controlled trial of linopirdine in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease
AU - Rockwood, Kenneth
AU - Beattie, B. Lynn
AU - Eastwood, M. Robin
AU - Feldman, Howard
AU - Mohr, Erich
AU - Pryse-Phillips, William
AU - Gauthier, Serge
PY - 1997/5
Y1 - 1997/5
N2 - Objectives: We tested the efficacy and safety of linopirdine, a novel phenylindolinone, in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. Methods: A multicentre, randomized, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled trial of linopirdine (30) mg three times per day or placebo). Patients (n = 382, 55% male, 98% Caucasian, age range 51-95 years) with mild or moderate Alzheimer's disease, of whom 375 received at least one treatment dose were analysed. There were no important differences between the groups at baseline. Results: No difference was seen in Clinical Global Impression scores between patients receiving placebo and those receiving linopirdine (n = 189). Small differences in the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) scores were seen throughout the study favouring linopirdine; at 6 months the ADAS-Cog scores were 20.2 (linopirdine) and 22.1 (placebo) p = 0.01. Conclusions: This trial did not detect clinically meaningful differences in patients receiving linopirdine for 6 months, despite evidence of a small degree of improved cognitive function. Further studies may benefit from more sensitive tests of treatment effects in Alzheimer's disease.
AB - Objectives: We tested the efficacy and safety of linopirdine, a novel phenylindolinone, in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. Methods: A multicentre, randomized, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled trial of linopirdine (30) mg three times per day or placebo). Patients (n = 382, 55% male, 98% Caucasian, age range 51-95 years) with mild or moderate Alzheimer's disease, of whom 375 received at least one treatment dose were analysed. There were no important differences between the groups at baseline. Results: No difference was seen in Clinical Global Impression scores between patients receiving placebo and those receiving linopirdine (n = 189). Small differences in the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) scores were seen throughout the study favouring linopirdine; at 6 months the ADAS-Cog scores were 20.2 (linopirdine) and 22.1 (placebo) p = 0.01. Conclusions: This trial did not detect clinically meaningful differences in patients receiving linopirdine for 6 months, despite evidence of a small degree of improved cognitive function. Further studies may benefit from more sensitive tests of treatment effects in Alzheimer's disease.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030956507&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030956507&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/S031716710002148X
DO - 10.1017/S031716710002148X
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0030956507
SN - 0317-1671
VL - 24
SP - 140
EP - 145
JO - Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences
JF - Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences
IS - 2
ER -