Abstract
Introduction: The purpose of the current study was to examine differences in factors associated with self-reported collision involvement of three age groups of drivers based on a large representative sample of Ontario adults. Method: This study was based on data from the CAMH Monitor, an ongoing cross-sectional telephone survey of Ontario adults 18 years and older from 2002 to 2005. Three age groups were examined: 18-34 (n = 1,294), 35-54 (n = 2,428), and 55+ (n = 1,576). For each age group sample, a logistic regression analysis was conducted of self-reported collision involvement in the last 12 months by risk factor measures of driving exposure (kilometers driven in a typical week, driving is stressful, and driving on busy roads), consuming five or more drinks of alcohol on one occasion (past 12 months), cannabis use (lifetime, and past 12 months), and driving after drinking among drinkers (past 12 months), controlling for demographics (gender, region, income, and marital status). Results: The study identified differences in factors associated with self-reported collision involvement of the three age groups of adult drivers. The logistic regression model for the youngest group revealed that drivers who reported that driving was stressful at least some of the time, drank five or more drinks on an occasion, and drove after drinking had an increased risk of collision involvement. For the middle age group, those who reported using cannabis in the last 12 months had significantly increased odds of reporting collision involvement. None of the risk factor measures showed significant associations with collision risk for older drivers (aged 55+). Impact: The results suggest potential areas for intervention and new directions for future research.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 445-449 |
Number of pages | 5 |
Journal | Journal of Safety Research |
Volume | 41 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Oct 2010 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:This research was supported by a grant from AUTO21, a member of the Networks of Centres of Excellence program which is administered and funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council , the Canadian Institutes of Health Research , and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council , in partnership with Industry Canada. The authors also acknowledge ongoing funding support from the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care . Funders had no involvement in the design, data collection, analysis, writing or decision to submit the paper for publication. The views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of AUTO21 or the Ministry of Health and Long Term Care.
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality