TY - JOUR
T1 - Attachment dimensions and young children's response to pain
AU - Walsh, Trudi M.
AU - McGrath, Patrick J.
AU - Symons, Douglas K.
PY - 2008
Y1 - 2008
N2 - Background/Objective: The present study examined the relationship between attachment dimensions and child pain behaviour following both an everyday pain incident (eg, bumps and scrapes) and acute pain incident (eg, immunization) in 66 five-year-old children. Methods: Secure, avoidant, ambivalent and controlling attachment dimensions were assessed using aggregates of laboratory-based reunion behaviour, performance on representational measures of attachment and the measure of emotion regulation. Child pain behaviour, during immunization and everyday pain incidents, was rated in terms of reactivity, anger and calming time. Results: The ambivalence and controlling attachment dimensions were differentially related to child pain behaviour. Specifically, children with either more ambivalent or controlling attachment had a relatively greater reaction to both the immunization procedure and everyday pain incident. Children with more controlling attachment also took more time to calm down following the immunization and displayed greater anger. Security and avoidance, however, were not systematically related to child pain behaviour. Conclusions: Results are discussed in terms of Bowlbys theory of attachment relationships and pain as an important distress signal to children.
AB - Background/Objective: The present study examined the relationship between attachment dimensions and child pain behaviour following both an everyday pain incident (eg, bumps and scrapes) and acute pain incident (eg, immunization) in 66 five-year-old children. Methods: Secure, avoidant, ambivalent and controlling attachment dimensions were assessed using aggregates of laboratory-based reunion behaviour, performance on representational measures of attachment and the measure of emotion regulation. Child pain behaviour, during immunization and everyday pain incidents, was rated in terms of reactivity, anger and calming time. Results: The ambivalence and controlling attachment dimensions were differentially related to child pain behaviour. Specifically, children with either more ambivalent or controlling attachment had a relatively greater reaction to both the immunization procedure and everyday pain incident. Children with more controlling attachment also took more time to calm down following the immunization and displayed greater anger. Security and avoidance, however, were not systematically related to child pain behaviour. Conclusions: Results are discussed in terms of Bowlbys theory of attachment relationships and pain as an important distress signal to children.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=41949103668&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=41949103668&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1155/2008/235329
DO - 10.1155/2008/235329
M3 - Article
C2 - 18301814
AN - SCOPUS:41949103668
SN - 1203-6765
VL - 13
SP - 33
EP - 40
JO - Pain Research and Management
JF - Pain Research and Management
IS - 1
ER -