Abstract
Aims/hypothesis: Islet transplantation is a treatment option that can help individuals with type 1 diabetes become insulin independent, but inefficient oxygen and nutrient delivery can hamper islet survival and engraftment due to the size of the islets and loss of the native microvasculature. We hypothesised that size-controlled pseudoislets engineered via centrifugal-forced-aggregation (CFA-PI) in a platform we previously developed would compare favourably with native islets, even after taking into account cell loss during the process. Methods: Human islets were dissociated and reaggregated into uniform, size-controlled CFA-PI in our microwell system. Their performance was assessed in vitro and in vivo over a range of sizes, and compared with that of unmodified native islets, as well as islet cell clusters formed by a conventional spontaneous aggregation approach (in which dissociated islet cells are cultured on ultra-low-attachment plates). In vitro studies included assays for membrane integrity, apoptosis, glucose-stimulated insulin secretion assay and total DNA content. In vivo efficacy was determined by transplantation under the kidney capsule of streptozotocin-treated Rag1−/− mice, with non-fasting blood glucose monitoring three times per week and IPGTT at day 60 for glucose response. A recovery nephrectomy, removing the graft, was conducted to confirm efficacy after completing the IPGTT. Architecture and composition were analysed by histological assessment via insulin, glucagon, pancreatic polypeptide, somatostatin, CD31 and von Willebrand factor staining. Results: CFA-PI exhibit markedly increased uniformity over native islets, as well as substantially improved glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (8.8-fold to 11.1-fold, even after taking cell loss into account) and hypoxia tolerance. In vivo, CFA-PI function similarly to (and potentially better than) native islets in reversing hyperglycaemia (55.6% for CFA-PI vs 20.0% for native islets at 500 islet equivalents [IEQ], and 77.8% for CFA-PI vs 55.6% for native islets at 1000 IEQ), and significantly better than spontaneously aggregated control cells (55.6% for CFA-PI vs 0% for spontaneous aggregation at 500 IEQ, and 77.8% CFA-PI vs 33.4% for spontaneous aggregation at 1000 IEQ; p < 0.05). Glucose clearance in the CFA-PI groups was improved over that in the native islet groups (CFA-PI 18.1 mmol/l vs native islets 29.7 mmol/l at 60 min; p < 0.05) to the point where they were comparable with the non-transplanted naive normoglycaemic control mice at a low IEQ of 500 IEQ (17.2 mmol/l at 60 min). Conclusions/interpretation: The ability to efficiently reformat dissociated islet cells into engineered pseudoislets with improved properties has high potential for both research and therapeutic applications.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 2016-2029 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | Diabetologia |
Volume | 61 |
Issue number | 9 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Sept 1 2018 |
Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:Funding Funding for this study was provided by Canadian Institutes of Health Research Operating Grant MOP-137095, an Alberta Diabetes Institute/Alberta Diabetes Foundation Pilot Project, the University of Calgary University Research Granting Council, and the Diabetes Research Institute Foundation of Canada (DRIFCan). YY is supported by an Alberta Diabetes Institute Graduate Studentship. AG is supported through an Alberta Diabetes Institute Blanch graduate award and Gladys Woodrow Wirtanen Studentship. AP is supported by the Alberta Innovates—Health Solutions (AIHS) Postdoctoral Fellowship Grant 201400496. AB is supported by Canadian Institutes of Health Research—Proof of Principle Grant 144255 and Stem Cell Network (SCN). BG-L is supported through an AIHS Clinician Fellowship Grant 201400106 and Izaak Walton Killam Memorial Scholarship. AMJS is supported through SCN Grant NCESCN CTRA FY17/CT5 and NCESCN DTRA FY17/DT6; AIHS Proof of Principle 144255 and Collaborative Research and Innovation Opportunities (CRIO) Team funding Grant 201201154; the JDRF Canadian Clinical Trial Network (JDRF CCTN) and the Diabetes Research Institute Foundation Canada (DRIFCan). MU is supported through SCN Grant FY17/CZN4, NSERC RGPIN-201404874, a CNIB Barbara Tuck Macphee Research Grant and CIHR MOP-137095. The funding sources had no role in the study design, study execution, analyses, interpretation of the data or decision to submit results.
Funding Information:
We thank J. Lyon, J. E. Manning Fox and P. Macdonald (IsletCore, Alberta Diabetes Institute, University of Alberta, Canada) for human islet isolations; the Cell Imaging Centre at the Alberta Diabetes Institute (University of Alberta, Canada) and the Biernaskie laboratory (University of Calgary, Canada) for the use of imaging equipment; CX Pan and the Krawetz and Klein laboratories (University of Calgary, Canada) for assistance in qRT-PCR experiments; and Histocore at the Alberta Diabetes Institute (University of Alberta, Canada) for histology services. MU is an inventor of the microwell system employed in this work and has a financial interest in it. The authors declare that there is no other duality of interest associated with their contribution this manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, The Author(s).
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Internal Medicine
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism