Campesino hunting and conservation in Latin America

Michael A. Petriello, Amanda L. Stronza

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Hunting presents a paradox for biodiversity conservation. It is both a problem and a solution to species declines and poverty. Yet, conservation scientists hold different assumptions about the significance and sustainability of hunting based on the cultures and identities of hunters. In Latin America, conservationists largely sort hunters as either indigenous or campesino. Indigenous hunters are often characterized as culturally driven stewards of wildlife sustainability. Campesino hunters, by contrast, are described as peasants—cultureless, uneducated, and uncaring toward wildlife sustainability. Although such ethnically fueled hunting discourse promotes hunting research, campesino hunters remain underrepresented in most comparative hunting reviews. Moreover, there are no targeted syntheses on the current state of knowledge about campesino hunting, nothing to guide conservation research and practice with and for the largest group of hunters in Latin America. We reviewed 334 articles published from 1937 to 2018 in English (55%) and Spanish (45%)—mostly published in 145 peer-reviewed journals—on the meanings, motivations, and sustainability of campesino hunting in Latin America. Although studies spanned 17 countries, 7 ecosystems, and >75 indigenous and nonindigenous demographics in 30 research contexts, they predominantly focused on nonindigenous campesinos for species-specific conservation and protected area management in tropical broadleaf forests of Mexico, Peru, and Colombia. Authors used 12 methods to collect campesino hunting data, primarily interviews, surveys, and questionnaires, and drew from 10 local and traditional knowledge themes about wildlife trends and uses. Eighteen drivers, 14 constraints, and 10 conflicts—mainly subsistence, income, ethics, regulations, and crop or livestock protection—shaped whether campesino hunters pursued 799 species, 70% of which were least concern species. Yet, only 25 studies (8%) empirically assessed sustainability. Our results show the need for increased interdisciplinary and geographic engagement with campesino hunting across Latin America.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)338-353
Number of pages16
JournalConservation Biology
Volume34
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 1 2020
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Our review emerged from M.A.P.’s dissertation research, which was generously supported by the Department of Recreation, Park and Tourism Sciences, The Center on Conflict and Development, and the Applied Biodiversity Science Program at Texas A&M University (IGERT #0654377). We thank E. Buchholtz for creating the map of Latin America, L. Fitzgerald for his invaluable insights and encouragement, C. Hunt for the opportunity to present and refine the preliminary results of this review, F. Fleischman for his support, L. Redmore, O. Redmore, M. Surovik, R. Surovik, and M.G. Petriello for additional logistic support, and 2 anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments on previous versions of our manuscript. We are deeply grateful to the Nicaraguan campesinos, NGO Paso Pacífico—specifically S. Otterstrom, K. Williams-Guillén, L. González, J. Martinez, and J.F. Vanegas Cortez–and colleagues, NGO affiliates, and mentors C. Chambers and S. Hagell who inspired, encouraged, and supported M.A.P.’s expanding interest in campesino hunting and local knowledge since 2008.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Society for Conservation Biology

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Campesino hunting and conservation in Latin America'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this