TY - JOUR
T1 - Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians Sepsis Guidelines
T2 - The optimal management of severe sepsis in Canadian emermency departments
AU - Green, Robert S.
AU - Djogovic, Dennis
AU - Gray, Sara
AU - Howes, Daniel
AU - Brindley, Peter G.
AU - Stenstrom, Robert
AU - Patterson, Edward
AU - Easton, David
AU - Davidow, Jonathan S.
PY - 2008/9
Y1 - 2008/9
N2 - Introduction: Optimal management of severe sepsis in the ED has evolved rapidly. The purpose of these guidelines is to review key management principles for Canadian emergency physicians, utilizing an evidence-based grading system. Methods: Key areas in the management of septic patents were determined by members of the CAEP Critical Care Interest Group (C4). Members of C4 were assigned a question to be answered after literature review, based on the Oxford grading system. After completion, each section underwent a secondary review by another member of C4. A tertiary review was conducted by additional external experts, and modifications were determined by consensus. Grading was based on peer-reviewed publications only, and where evidence was insufficient to address an important topic, a "practice point" was provided based on group opinion. Results: The project was initiated in 2005 and completed in December 2007. Key areas which were reviewed include the definition of sepsis, the use of invasive procedures, fluid resuscitation, vasopressor/ inotrope use, the importance of culture acquisition in the ED, antimicrobial therapy and source control. Other areas reviewed included the use of corticosteroids, activated protein C, transfusions and mechanical ventilation. Conclusion: Early sepsis management in the ED is paramount for optimal patient outcomes. The CAEP Critical Care Interest Group Sepsis Position Statement provides a framework to improve the ED care of this patient population.
AB - Introduction: Optimal management of severe sepsis in the ED has evolved rapidly. The purpose of these guidelines is to review key management principles for Canadian emergency physicians, utilizing an evidence-based grading system. Methods: Key areas in the management of septic patents were determined by members of the CAEP Critical Care Interest Group (C4). Members of C4 were assigned a question to be answered after literature review, based on the Oxford grading system. After completion, each section underwent a secondary review by another member of C4. A tertiary review was conducted by additional external experts, and modifications were determined by consensus. Grading was based on peer-reviewed publications only, and where evidence was insufficient to address an important topic, a "practice point" was provided based on group opinion. Results: The project was initiated in 2005 and completed in December 2007. Key areas which were reviewed include the definition of sepsis, the use of invasive procedures, fluid resuscitation, vasopressor/ inotrope use, the importance of culture acquisition in the ED, antimicrobial therapy and source control. Other areas reviewed included the use of corticosteroids, activated protein C, transfusions and mechanical ventilation. Conclusion: Early sepsis management in the ED is paramount for optimal patient outcomes. The CAEP Critical Care Interest Group Sepsis Position Statement provides a framework to improve the ED care of this patient population.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=54949129388&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=54949129388&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/s148180350001054x
DO - 10.1017/s148180350001054x
M3 - Review article
C2 - 18826733
AN - SCOPUS:54949129388
SN - 1481-8035
VL - 10
SP - 443
EP - 459
JO - Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine
JF - Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine
IS - 5
ER -