Canadian society of nephrology commentary on the KDIGO clinical practice guideline for CKD evaluation and management

Ayub Akbari, Catherine M. Clase, Phil Acott, Marisa Battistella, Aminu Bello, Patrick Feltmate, Allan Grill, Meena Karsanji, Paul Komenda, Francois Madore, Braden J. Manns, Sara Mahdavi, Reem A. Mustafa, Andrew Smyth, E. Sohani Welcher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

99 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We congratulate the KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) work group on their comprehensive work in a broad subject area and agreed with many of the recommendations in their clinical practice guideline on the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease. We concur with the KDIGO definitions and classification of kidney disease and welcome the addition of albuminuria categories at all levels of glomerular filtration rate (GFR), the terminology of G categories rather than stages to describe level of GFR, the division of former stage 3 into new G categories 3a and 3b, and the addition of the underlying diagnosis. We agree with the use of the heat map to illustrate the relative contributions of low GFR and albuminuria to cardiovascular and renal risk, though we thought that the highest risk category was too broad, including as it does people at disparate levels of risk. We add an albuminuria category A4 for nephrotic-range proteinuria and D and T categories for patients on dialysis or with a functioning renal transplant. We recommend target blood pressure of 140/90 mm Hg regardless of diabetes or proteinuria, and against the combination of angiotensin receptor blockers with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. We recommend against routine protein restriction. We concur on individualization of hemoglobin A1c targets. We do not agree with routine restriction of sodium intake to <2 g/d, instead suggesting reduction of sodium intake in those with high intake (>3.3 g/d). We suggest screening for anemia only when GFR is <30 mL/min/1.73 m2. We recognize the absence of evidence on appropriate phosphate targets and methods of achieving them and do not agree with suggestions in this area. In drug dosing, we agree with the recommendation of using absolute clearance (ie, milliliters per minute), calculated from the patient's estimated GFR (which is normalized to 1.73 m2) and the patient's actual anthropomorphic body surface area. We agree with referral to a nephrologist when GFR is <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 (and for many other scenarios), but suggest urine albumin-creatinine ratio > 60 mg/mmol or proteinuria with protein excretion > 1 g/d as the referral threshold for proteinuria.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)177-205
Number of pages29
JournalAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases
Volume65
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 1 2015

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Support: No financial support was required for the development of this commentary.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 National Kidney Foundation, Inc.

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Nephrology

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article
  • Review

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Canadian society of nephrology commentary on the KDIGO clinical practice guideline for CKD evaluation and management'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this