Abstract
PURPOSE Case management (CM) is a promising intervention for frequent users of health care services. Our research question was how and under what circum-stances does CM in primary care work to improve outcomes among frequent users with chronic conditions? METHODS We conducted a realist synthesis, searching MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, and PsycINFO (1996 to September 2017) for articles meeting the following criteria: (1) population: adult frequent users with chronic disease, (2) intervention: CM in a primary care setting with a postintervention evaluation, and (3) primary outcomes: integration of services, health care system use, cost, and patient outcome measures. Academic and gray literature were evaluated for relevance and robustness. Independent reviewers extracted data to identify con-text, mechanism, and outcome (CMO) configurations. Analysis of CMO configurations allowed for the modification of an initial program theory toward a refined program theory. RESULTS Of the 9,295 records retrieved, 21 peer-reviewed articles and an addi-tional 89 documents were retained. We evaluated 19 CM interventions and identified 11 CMO configurations. The development of a trusting relationship fostering patient and clinician engagement in the CM intervention was recurrent in many CMO configurations. CONCLUSION Our refined program theory proposes that in the context of easy access to an experienced and trusted case manager who provides comprehensive care while maintaining positive interactions with patients, the development of this relationship fosters the engagement of both individuals and yields positive outcomes when the following mechanisms are triggered: patients and clinicians feel supported, respected, accepted, engaged, and committed; and patients feel less anxious, more secure, and empowered to self-manage.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 218-226 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Annals of Family Medicine |
Volume | 18 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - May 1 2020 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:Funding support: This project was funded by the Pan-Canadian SPOR Network in Primary and Integrated Health Care Innovations-Knowledge Synthesis Grant of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, with contributions from the Department of Family and Emergency Medicine of the University of Sherbrooke, the University of Sherbrooke Hospital Centre, Réseau 1 Québec, the Institut Universitaire de Première Ligne en Santé et Services of the Integrated University Health and Social Services Centre of L’Estrie-CHUS, the University of Québec in Chicoutimi, the Newfoundland and Labrador Medical Association, and the Saskatchewan Health Research Foundation.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Annals of Family Medicine, Inc. All rights reserved.
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Family Practice
PubMed: MeSH publication types
- Evaluation Study
- Journal Article
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't