Classification of adenosine receptors mediating antinociception in the rat spinal cord

J. Sawynok, M. I. Sweeney, T. D. White

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

151 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Analogues of adenosine were injected intrathecally into rats implanted with chronic indwelling cannulae in order to determine a rank order of potency and hence characterize adenosine receptors involved in spinal antinociception. In the tail flick test l‐N6‐phenylisopropyl adenosine (l‐PIA), cyclohexyladenosine (CHA) and 5′‐N‐ethylcarboxamide adenosine (NECA) produced dose‐related antinociception which attained a plateau level. NECA and CHA also produced an additional distinct second phase of antinociception. d‐N6‐Phenylisopropyl adenosine (d‐PIA) and 2‐chloroadenosine (CADO) had very little antinociceptive activity in this test. The rank order of potency in producing the plateau effect was l‐PIA > CHA > NECA > d‐PIA = CADO, while that for the second phase of antinociception was NECA >‐CHA. Pretreatment with both theophylline and 8‐phenyltheophylline (8‐PT) antagonized antinociception produced by CHA, with 8‐PT being at least an order of magnitude more potent than theophylline. Both antagonists produced a significant hyperalgesia in the tail flick test. l‐PIA and CHA also produced methylxanthine‐sensitive antinociception in the hot plate test. These results suggest that activation of A1‐receptors in the spinal cord can produce antinociception. Activation of A2‐receptors may produce an additional effect, but the relative activity of CHA in this component of activity is unusual. 1986 British Pharmacological Society

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)923-930
Number of pages8
JournalBritish Journal of Pharmacology
Volume88
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 1986

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Pharmacology

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Classification of adenosine receptors mediating antinociception in the rat spinal cord'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this