Climax thinking, place attachment, and utilitarian landscapes: Implications for wind energy development

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As a means of understanding responses to landscape change, the concept of climax thinking proposes that communities resist changes because individuals view their current landscape as in its optimal state. We examined perceptions of past landscape change to help predict support for future change in the context of wind energy in the Chignecto area, Atlantic Canada. Change is this region includes a wind farm built in 2012 and the longer-term loss of four landscape features: dykes from the 1600s are being modified due to rising seas, foundries from the 1800s no longer exist, most giant hay barns from the 1800s have collapsed, and radio towers from WWII were dismantled. To assess local responses to these changes, we designed and randomly distributed a mail survey. The survey asked about exposure to turbines, support for wind energy, and demographics. Half the sample received images and descriptions of the four previous features, accompanied by questions about fit in the landscape and sadness at loss. These items were combined to create a climax thinking scale. Regression analysis reveals neither place attachment nor time in the region to be predictors of climax thinking, while male gender and conservative politics increase climax thinking. Conservatism decreases support for wind energy among people who can't see turbines from home and is not significant for people who can. Climax thinking increases wind support among people who can see them from home but is not significant for people who can't. Implications of results for renewable energy transitions are explored.

Original languageEnglish
Article number103802
JournalLandscape and Urban Planning
Volume199
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2020

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Ellen Chappell was supported throughout this research by the Canada Graduate Scholarships Master’s Program award through the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC), the Nova Scotia Graduate Scholarship (NSGS), and the School for Resource and Environmental Studies (SRES) Legacy Scholarship. Operating funds for the study were provided through a SSHRC Insight Grant (grant number 435-2017-0281) awarded to John Parkins. We would like to thank all survey participants in the Chignecto area for their interest in this study and for taking the time to complete our survey and be involved with this research. This study was reviewed and approved by the Dalhousie University Social Sciences & Humanities Research Ethics Board to be in accordance with the Tri-Council Policy Statement on Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans (REB # 2018-4467).

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier B.V.

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Ecology
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Climax thinking, place attachment, and utilitarian landscapes: Implications for wind energy development'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this