Combining modifiable risk factors and risk of dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Ruth Peters, Andrew Booth, Kenneth Rockwood, Jean Peters, Catherine D'Este, Kaarin J. Anstey

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

178 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective To systematically review the literature relating to the impact of multiple co-occurring modifiable risk factors for cognitive decline and dementia. Design A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature relating to the impact of co-occurring key risk factors for incident cognitive decline and dementia. All abstracts and full text were screened independently by two reviewers and each article assessed for bias using a standard checklist. A fixed effects meta-analysis was undertaken. Data sources Databases Medline, Embase and PsycINFO were searched from 1999 to 2017. Eligibility criteria For inclusion articles were required to report longitudinal data from participants free of cognitive decline at baseline, with formal assessment of cognitive function or dementia during follow-up, and an aim to examine the impact of additive or clustered comorbid risk factor burden in with two or more core modifiable risk factors. Results Seventy-nine full-text articles were examined. Twenty-two articles (18 studies) were included reporting data on >40 000 participants. Included studies consistently reported an increased risk associated with greater numbers of intraindividual risk factors or unhealthy behaviours and the opposite for healthy or protective behaviours. A meta-analysis of studies with dementia outcomes resulted in a pooled relative risk for dementia of 1.20 (95%CI 1.04 to 1.39) for one risk factor, 1.65 (95%CI 1.40 to 1.94) for two and 2.21 (95%CI 1.78 to 2.73) for three or more, relative to no risk factors. Limitations include dependence on published results and variations in study outcome, cognitive assessment, length of follow-up and definition of risk factor exposure.conclusions The strength of the reported associations, the consistency across studies and the suggestion of a dose response supports a need to keep modifiable risk factor exposure to a minimum and to avoid exposure to additional modifiable risks. Further research is needed to establish whether particular combinations of risk factors confer greater risk than others.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere022846
JournalBMJ Open
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2019

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Funding No funding was received specifically for this work. RP is funded by the Australian Dementia Collaborative Research Centre. AB’s input into the literature search and review design was undertaken under his University of Sheffield employment contract. KR is funded through the Dalhousie Medical Research Foundation as the Kathryn Allen Weldon Professor of Alzheimer’s Research and receives research funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Canadian Frailty Network and the Fountain Family Research Fund of the Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre. JP received no support from any organisation for the submitted work. KJA is funded by NHMRC Fellowship APP1102694.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Author(s) (or their employer(s)).

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Combining modifiable risk factors and risk of dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this