Comparison of static and dynamic measurements of intrinsic PEEP in mechanically ventilated patients

François Maltais, Hajo Reissmann, Paolo Navalesi, Paul Hernandez, Ashvini Gursahaney, V. Marco Ranieri, Marta Sovilj, Stewart B. Gottfried

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

83 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPi) is routinely determined under static conditions by occluding the airway at end-expiration (PEEPi,stat), the resulting plateau pressure representing the average PEEPi present within a nonhomogeneous lung. In contrast, PEEPi can also be evaluated dynamically (PEEPi,dyn) by recording the change in pressure required to initiate lung inflation. It has been suggested that PEEPi,dyn reflects the lowest regional PEEPi, and therefore underestimates PEEPi,stat in the presence of heterogenous mechanical properties. The purposes of this study were (1) to compare PEEPi obtained with these two methods in mechanically ventilated patients with significant airway obstruction (AWO) and those without (non-AWO), and (2) to relate any discrepancies observed with other indices of respiratory mechanics. PEEPi,stat, PEEPi,dyn, and respiratory mechanics were measured during controlled mechanical ventilation in 22 sedated, paralyzed patients. PEEPi,dyn was significantly less than PEEPi,stat in AWO, averaging 3.0 ± 0.5 (SEM) and 9.3 ± 1.1 (SEM) cm H2O, respectively (p < 0.0001). In contrast, these values were more comparable in non-AWO, averaging 4.6 ± 0.8 and 5.4 ± 1.0 cm H2O (p > 0.05). As a result, the ratio of PEEPi,dyn to PEEPi,stat amounted to 0.36 ± 0.06 for AWO compared with 0.87 ± 0.05 in non-AWO (p < 0.005). Maximal (Rmax) and minimal (Rmin) respiratory resistance were greater in AWO whereas respiratory compliance (Crs) was no different between groups. PEEPi,dyn/PEEPi,stat was inversely related to ΔP, the pressure losses attributable to time constant inequalities and viscoelastic tissue properties (r = 0.64, p < 0.005). No correlation was found between this ratio and Rmax, Rmin, or Crs. In conclusion, PEEPi,dyn significantly underestimates PEEPi,stat in patients with AWO, in contrast to those without AWO. The data suggest that this difference is related to regional inequalities in mechanical time constants within the lung and/or increased viscoelastic pressure losses.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1318-1324
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Volume150
Issue number5 I
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 1994

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of static and dynamic measurements of intrinsic PEEP in mechanically ventilated patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Maltais, F., Reissmann, H., Navalesi, P., Hernandez, P., Gursahaney, A., Ranieri, V. M., Sovilj, M., & Gottfried, S. B. (1994). Comparison of static and dynamic measurements of intrinsic PEEP in mechanically ventilated patients. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 150(5 I), 1318-1324. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.150.5.7952559