Comparison of the SIMARD MD to clinical impression in assessing fitness to drive in patients with cognitive impairment

Madelaine Wernham, Pamela G. Jarrett, Connie Stewart, Elizabeth MacDonald, Donna MacNeil, Cynthia Hobbs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background The assessment of fitness to drive in patients with cognitive impairment is complex. The SIMARD MD was developed to assist with assessing fitness to drive. This study compares the clinical decision made by a geriatrician regarding driving with the SIMARD MD score. Methods Patients with a diagnosis of mild dementia or mild cognitive impairment, who had a SIMARD MD test, were included in the sample. A retrospective chart review was completed to gather diagnosis, driving status, and cognitive and functional information. Results Sixty-three patients were identified and 57 met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 77.1 years (SD 8.9). The most common diagnosis was Alzheimer'fs disease in 22 (38.6%) patients. The mean MMSE score was 24.9 (SD 3.34) and the mean MoCA was 19.9 (SD 3.58). The mean SIMARD MD score was 37.2 (SD 19.54). Twenty-four patients had a SIMARD MD score ≤30, twenty-eight between 31.70, and five scored > 70. The SIMARD MD scores did not differ significantly compared to the clinical decision (ANOVA p value = 0.14). Conclusions There was no association between the SIMARD MD scores and the geriatricians clinical decision regarding fitness to drive in persons with mild dementia or mild cognitive impairment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)63-69
Number of pages7
JournalCanadian Geriatrics Journal
Volume17
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2014
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Author(s).

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Gerontology
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of the SIMARD MD to clinical impression in assessing fitness to drive in patients with cognitive impairment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this