Propst, E. J., Wolter, N. E., Ishman, S. L., Balakrishnan, K., Deonarain, A. R., Mehta, D., Zalzal, G., Pransky, S. M., Roy, S., Myer, C. M., Torre, M., Johnson, R. F., Ludemann, J. P., Derkay, C. S., Chun, R. H., Hong, P., Molter, D. W., Prager, J. D., Nguyen, L. H. P., ... Faucett, E. A. (2020). Competency-Based Assessment Tool for Pediatric Tracheotomy: International Modified Delphi Consensus. Laryngoscope, 130(11), 2700-2707. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.28461
Propst, EJ, Wolter, NE, Ishman, SL, Balakrishnan, K, Deonarain, AR, Mehta, D, Zalzal, G, Pransky, SM, Roy, S, Myer, CM, Torre, M, Johnson, RF, Ludemann, JP, Derkay, CS, Chun, RH, Hong, P, Molter, DW, Prager, JD, Nguyen, LHP, Rutter, MJ, Myer, CM, Zur, KB, Sidell, DR, Johnson, LB, Cotton, RT, Hart, CK, Willging, JP, Zdanski, CJ, Manoukian, JJ, Lam, DJ, Bauman, NM, Gantwerker, EA, Husein, M, Inglis, AF, Green, GE, Javia, LR, Schraff, S, Soma, MA, Deutsch, ES, Sobol, SE, Ida, JB, Choi, S, Uwiera, TC, Shah, UK, White, DR, Wootten, CT, El-Hakim, H, Bromwich, MA, Richter, GT, Vijayasekaran, S, Smith, ME, Vaccani, JP, Hartnick, CJ & Faucett, EA 2020, 'Competency-Based Assessment Tool for Pediatric Tracheotomy: International Modified Delphi Consensus', Laryngoscope, vol. 130, no. 11, pp. 2700-2707. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.28461
@article{068f72add818449ebaf154e9f36f96a0,
title = "Competency-Based Assessment Tool for Pediatric Tracheotomy: International Modified Delphi Consensus",
abstract = "Objectives/Hypothesis: Create a competency-based assessment tool for pediatric tracheotomy. Study Design: Blinded, modified, Delphi consensus process. Methods: Using the REDCap database, a list of 31 potential items was circulated to 65 expert surgeons who perform pediatric tracheotomy. In the first round, items were rated as “keep” or “remove,” and comments were incorporated. In the second round, experts were asked to rate the importance of each item on a seven-point Likert scale. Consensus criteria were determined a priori with a goal of 7 to 25 final items. Results: The first round achieved a response rate of 39/65 (60.0%), and returned questionnaires were 99.5% complete. All items were rated as “keep,” and 137 comments were incorporated. In the second round, 30 task-specific and seven previously validated global rating items were distributed, and the response rate was 44/65 (67.7%), with returned questionnaires being 99.3% complete. Of the Task-Specific Items, 13 reached consensus, 10 were near consensus, and 7 did not achieve consensus. For the 7 previously validated global rating items, 5 reached consensus and two were near consensus. Conclusions: It is feasible to reach consensus on the important steps involved in pediatric tracheotomy using a modified Delphi consensus process. These items can now be considered to create a competency-based assessment tool for pediatric tracheotomy. Such a tool will hopefully allow trainees to focus on the important aspects of this procedure and help teaching programs standardize how they evaluate trainees during this procedure. Level of Evidence: 5 Laryngoscope, 130:2700–2707, 2020.",
author = "Propst, {Evan J.} and Wolter, {Nikolaus E.} and Ishman, {Stacey L.} and Karthik Balakrishnan and Deonarain, {Ashley R.} and Deepak Mehta and George Zalzal and Pransky, {Seth M.} and Soham Roy and Myer, {Charles M.} and Michele Torre and Johnson, {Romaine F.} and Ludemann, {Jeffrey P.} and Derkay, {Craig S.} and Chun, {Robert H.} and Paul Hong and Molter, {David W.} and Prager, {Jeremy D.} and Nguyen, {Lily H.P.} and Rutter, {Michael J.} and Myer, {Charles M.} and Zur, {Karen B.} and Sidell, {Douglas R.} and Johnson, {Liane B.} and Cotton, {Robin T.} and Hart, {Catherine K.} and Willging, {J. Paul} and Zdanski, {Carlton J.} and Manoukian, {John J.} and Lam, {Derek J.} and Bauman, {Nancy M.} and Gantwerker, {Eric A.} and Murad Husein and Inglis, {Andrew F.} and Green, {Glenn E.} and Javia, {Luv Ram} and Scott Schraff and Soma, {Marlene A.} and Deutsch, {Ellen S.} and Sobol, {Steven E.} and Ida, {Jonathan B.} and Sukgi Choi and Uwiera, {Trina C.} and Shah, {Udayan K.} and White, {David R.} and Wootten, {Christopher T.} and Hamdy El-Hakim and Bromwich, {Matthew A.} and Richter, {Gresham T.} and Shyan Vijayasekaran and Smith, {Marshall E.} and Vaccani, {Jean Philippe} and Hartnick, {Christopher J.} and Faucett, {Erynne A.}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2019 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.",
year = "2020",
month = nov,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/lary.28461",
language = "English",
volume = "130",
pages = "2700--2707",
journal = "Laryngoscope",
issn = "0023-852X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "11",
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Competency-Based Assessment Tool for Pediatric Tracheotomy
T2 - International Modified Delphi Consensus
AU - Propst, Evan J.
AU - Wolter, Nikolaus E.
AU - Ishman, Stacey L.
AU - Balakrishnan, Karthik
AU - Deonarain, Ashley R.
AU - Mehta, Deepak
AU - Zalzal, George
AU - Pransky, Seth M.
AU - Roy, Soham
AU - Myer, Charles M.
AU - Torre, Michele
AU - Johnson, Romaine F.
AU - Ludemann, Jeffrey P.
AU - Derkay, Craig S.
AU - Chun, Robert H.
AU - Hong, Paul
AU - Molter, David W.
AU - Prager, Jeremy D.
AU - Nguyen, Lily H.P.
AU - Rutter, Michael J.
AU - Myer, Charles M.
AU - Zur, Karen B.
AU - Sidell, Douglas R.
AU - Johnson, Liane B.
AU - Cotton, Robin T.
AU - Hart, Catherine K.
AU - Willging, J. Paul
AU - Zdanski, Carlton J.
AU - Manoukian, John J.
AU - Lam, Derek J.
AU - Bauman, Nancy M.
AU - Gantwerker, Eric A.
AU - Husein, Murad
AU - Inglis, Andrew F.
AU - Green, Glenn E.
AU - Javia, Luv Ram
AU - Schraff, Scott
AU - Soma, Marlene A.
AU - Deutsch, Ellen S.
AU - Sobol, Steven E.
AU - Ida, Jonathan B.
AU - Choi, Sukgi
AU - Uwiera, Trina C.
AU - Shah, Udayan K.
AU - White, David R.
AU - Wootten, Christopher T.
AU - El-Hakim, Hamdy
AU - Bromwich, Matthew A.
AU - Richter, Gresham T.
AU - Vijayasekaran, Shyan
AU - Smith, Marshall E.
AU - Vaccani, Jean Philippe
AU - Hartnick, Christopher J.
AU - Faucett, Erynne A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.
PY - 2020/11/1
Y1 - 2020/11/1
N2 - Objectives/Hypothesis: Create a competency-based assessment tool for pediatric tracheotomy. Study Design: Blinded, modified, Delphi consensus process. Methods: Using the REDCap database, a list of 31 potential items was circulated to 65 expert surgeons who perform pediatric tracheotomy. In the first round, items were rated as “keep” or “remove,” and comments were incorporated. In the second round, experts were asked to rate the importance of each item on a seven-point Likert scale. Consensus criteria were determined a priori with a goal of 7 to 25 final items. Results: The first round achieved a response rate of 39/65 (60.0%), and returned questionnaires were 99.5% complete. All items were rated as “keep,” and 137 comments were incorporated. In the second round, 30 task-specific and seven previously validated global rating items were distributed, and the response rate was 44/65 (67.7%), with returned questionnaires being 99.3% complete. Of the Task-Specific Items, 13 reached consensus, 10 were near consensus, and 7 did not achieve consensus. For the 7 previously validated global rating items, 5 reached consensus and two were near consensus. Conclusions: It is feasible to reach consensus on the important steps involved in pediatric tracheotomy using a modified Delphi consensus process. These items can now be considered to create a competency-based assessment tool for pediatric tracheotomy. Such a tool will hopefully allow trainees to focus on the important aspects of this procedure and help teaching programs standardize how they evaluate trainees during this procedure. Level of Evidence: 5 Laryngoscope, 130:2700–2707, 2020.
AB - Objectives/Hypothesis: Create a competency-based assessment tool for pediatric tracheotomy. Study Design: Blinded, modified, Delphi consensus process. Methods: Using the REDCap database, a list of 31 potential items was circulated to 65 expert surgeons who perform pediatric tracheotomy. In the first round, items were rated as “keep” or “remove,” and comments were incorporated. In the second round, experts were asked to rate the importance of each item on a seven-point Likert scale. Consensus criteria were determined a priori with a goal of 7 to 25 final items. Results: The first round achieved a response rate of 39/65 (60.0%), and returned questionnaires were 99.5% complete. All items were rated as “keep,” and 137 comments were incorporated. In the second round, 30 task-specific and seven previously validated global rating items were distributed, and the response rate was 44/65 (67.7%), with returned questionnaires being 99.3% complete. Of the Task-Specific Items, 13 reached consensus, 10 were near consensus, and 7 did not achieve consensus. For the 7 previously validated global rating items, 5 reached consensus and two were near consensus. Conclusions: It is feasible to reach consensus on the important steps involved in pediatric tracheotomy using a modified Delphi consensus process. These items can now be considered to create a competency-based assessment tool for pediatric tracheotomy. Such a tool will hopefully allow trainees to focus on the important aspects of this procedure and help teaching programs standardize how they evaluate trainees during this procedure. Level of Evidence: 5 Laryngoscope, 130:2700–2707, 2020.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85076720869&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85076720869&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/lary.28461
DO - 10.1002/lary.28461
M3 - Article
C2 - 31821571
AN - SCOPUS:85076720869
SN - 0023-852X
VL - 130
SP - 2700
EP - 2707
JO - Laryngoscope
JF - Laryngoscope
IS - 11
ER -