Conflict of interest in commercial bank security underwritings: Canadian evidence

Gregory M. Hebb, Donald R. Fraser

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The recent repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act in the US has cleared the way for commercial banks to enter the securities underwriting business. Many of the concerns that resulted in the original passage of the Glass-Steagall Act, however, still exist. One of these is the possible conflict of interest a universal bank faces. This paper provides evidence on this issue from the experience of Canada following its removal of restrictions on chartered bank ownership of investment dealers. Both ex ante bond yield comparisons between commercial and investment bank underwritten issues and equity price reactions to bond issue announcements provide no evidence of a conflict of interest.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1935-1949
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Banking and Finance
Volume26
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2002
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Finance
  • Economics and Econometrics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Conflict of interest in commercial bank security underwritings: Canadian evidence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this