Abstract
Marine protected areas (MPAs) have emerged as a valuable tool in biodiversity conservation and fisheries management. However, the effective use of MPAs depends upon the successful integration of social and ecological information. We investigated relationships between the social system structure of coastal communities alongside biological data describing the status and trends in fish communities around Yap, Micronesia. Traditional marine tenure made Yap an ideal place to investigate the underlying principles of social-ecological systems, as communities own and manage spatially-defined coastal resources. Analysis of social survey data revealed three social regimes, which were linked to corresponding gradients of ecological outcomes. Communities with decentralized decision-making and a preference for communal forms of fishing had the greatest ecological outcomes, while communities lacking any form of leadership were linked to poor ecological outcomes. Interestingly, communities with strong top-down leadership were shown to have variable ecological outcomes, depending on the presence of key groups or individuals. We last investigated whether social perception could successfully predict the status of fish assemblages within non-managed reefs. Several biological metrics of fish assemblages within non-managed areas were significantly predicted by a gradient of human access, suggesting social perception could not predict the growing human footprint over the study period. These findings highlight the potentially overlooked role that community-oriented decision-making structures and fishing methods could play in successful conservation efforts, and the limitations of perception data. Policies that promote communal marine resource use offer a novel approach to improve fisheries management and promote social-ecological resilience.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 108288 |
Journal | Biological Conservation |
Volume | 241 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jan 2020 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:This work was supported by the Micronesia Conservation Trust [grant number N/A]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection, and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. We declare that this manuscript has not been published elsewhere and is not under consideration by another journal. No portion of this manuscript has been previously submitted to Biological Conservation. All authors have approved the manuscript and agree with its submission to Biological Conservation. Each named author has contributed to conducting the underlying research and drafting of this manuscript. The authors declare no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise. Funding for this study has been acknowledged in the text and our social surveys were approved by the University of Guam Committee on Human Research Subjects (CHRS# 17-60).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elsevier Ltd
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Nature and Landscape Conservation