Deliberative engagement: An inclusive methodology for exploring professionalization

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Early on in the development of Practicing Healthcare Ethicists Exploring Professionalization (PHEEP), the founding members recognized the need to address and meet two important goals: (1) the creation of a dynamic, rigorous process to support the exploratory work, and (2) the establishment of the means - deliberative engagement - to generate and justify the substantive content of professionalization-related products, such as practice standards and position statements. Drawing from social justice and deliberative democracy conceptions and insights (among others), the authors identify and describe the core elements of the "process scaffolding" and "deliberative means" that inform PHEEP's deliberative engagement methodology. The paper demonstrates how these process and substantive features have been meaningfully instantiated in the decision making framework established by PHEEP for its use in the development of professionalization-related products by Canadian practicing healthcare ethicists.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)187-201
Number of pages15
JournalHEC Forum
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2012

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
• Sources of research funding including the Canadian Institutes of Health Research

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects
  • Health(social science)
  • Health Policy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Deliberative engagement: An inclusive methodology for exploring professionalization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this