Differences in experiences of barriers to STI testing between clients of the internet-based diagnostic testing service GetCheckedOnline.com and an STI clinic in Vancouver, Canada

Mark Gilbert, Kimberly Thomson, Travis Salway, Devon Haag, Troy Grennan, Christopher K. Fairley, Chris Buchner, Mel Krajden, Perry Kendall, Jean Shoveller, Gina Ogilvie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives Internet-based STI testing programmes may overcome barriers posed by in-clinic testing, though uptake could reflect social gradients. The role these services play in comparison to clinical testing services is unknown. We compared experiences of testing barriers between STI clinic clients to clients of GetCheckedOnline.com (GCO; where clients take a printed lab form to a lab). Methods Our 10-month cross-sectional study was conducted after GCO was promoted to STI clinic clients and men who have sex with men (MSM). Clinic and GCO clients completed an online survey assessing testing barriers and facilitators; responses were compared using bivariate analysis (level of significance P<0.01; significant results below). Results Compared with 321 clinic clients, the 73 GCO clients were more likely to be older (median 35 vs 30 years), MSM (45% vs 16%), be testing routinely (67% vs 39%), have delayed testing for any reason (76% vs 54%) and due to clinic distance (28% vs 9%), report delays due to wait times (50% vs 17%), embarrassment with testing (16% vs 6%), discomfort discussing sexual health where they usually go for testing (39% vs 22%), as well as discomfort discussing sexual history with (19% vs 5%) and fearing judgement from (30% vs 15%) any healthcare provider. GCO clients were less likely to have found clinic hours convenient (59% vs 77%) and clinic appointments easy to make (49% vs 66%), and more likely to report long wait times (50% vs 17%). We found no differences in technology skills/use. Conclusions In this urban setting, an internet-based testing service effectively engaged individuals experiencing testing barriers, with few social gradients in uptake. While some testing barriers could be addressed through increasing access to clinical services, others require social and structural changes, highlighting the importance of internet-based STI testing services to increasing test uptake.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)151-156
Number of pages6
JournalSexually Transmitted Infections
Volume95
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 1 2019
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Funding Funding for this study was provided by the canadian institutes of Health research (grants PHe-114129, PHe-318068) which played no other role in this study.

Funding Information:
Competing interests MK has received contract or grant funding to his institution from roche, Merck, Hologic, Boehringer ingelheim, and Siemens that was unrelated to this work.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019; Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2019. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Dermatology
  • Infectious Diseases

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Differences in experiences of barriers to STI testing between clients of the internet-based diagnostic testing service GetCheckedOnline.com and an STI clinic in Vancouver, Canada'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this