Differential entrainment distinguishes atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia from atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia

Aamir H. Khan, Aliasghar Khadem, Magdy N. Basta, Martin J. Gardner, Ratika Parkash, Lorne J. Gula, John L. Sapp

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Entrainment from the right ventricular (RV) apex and the base has been used to distinguish atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT) from atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT). The difference in the entrainment response from the RV apex in comparison with the RV base has not been tested. Methods: Fifty-nine consecutive patients referred for ablation of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) were included. Entrainment of SVT was performed from the RV apex and base, pacing at 10-40-ms faster than the tachycardia cycle length. SA interval was calculated from stimulus to earliest atrial electrogram. Ventricle to atrium (VA) interval was measured from the RV electrogram (apex and base) to the earliest atrial electrogram during tachycardia. The SA-VA interval from apex and base was measured and the difference between them was calculated. Results: Thirty-six AVNRT and 23 AVRT patients were enrolled. Mean age was 44 ± 12 years; 52% were male. The [SA-VA]apex-[SA-VA]base was demonstrable in 84.7% of patients and measured -9.4 ± 6.6 in AVNRT and 10 ± 11.3 in AVRT, P < 0.001. The difference was negative for all AVNRT cases and positive for all septal accessory pathways (APs). Conclusion: The difference between entrainment from the apex and base is readily performed and is diagnostic for all AVNRTs and septal APs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1335-1341
Number of pages7
JournalPACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Volume33
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2010

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Differential entrainment distinguishes atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia from atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this