TY - JOUR
T1 - Does Specialized Inpatient Rehabilitation Affect Whether or Not People with Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury Return Home?
AU - RHSCIR Network
AU - Cheng, Christiana L.
AU - Plashkes, Tova
AU - Shen, Tian
AU - Fallah, Nader
AU - Humphreys, Suzanne
AU - O'Connell, Colleen
AU - Linassi, A. Gary
AU - Ho, Chester
AU - Short, Christine
AU - Ethans, Karen
AU - Charbonneau, Rebecca
AU - Paquet, Jérôme
AU - Noonan, Vanessa K.
AU - Rogers, Daniel
AU - Walden, Kristen
AU - Shurgold, Jayson
AU - Chen, Jason
AU - Eapen, Jessica
AU - Buenaventura, Jerome
AU - Aspinall, Arlene
AU - Morin, Cynthia
AU - Sproule, Shannon
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by financial contributions from the Rick Hansen Institute, the Ontario Neurotrauma Foundation, and the Government of Canada through Health Canada and Western Economic Diversification Canada.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2017, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
PY - 2017/10/15
Y1 - 2017/10/15
N2 - Return to living at home is an important patient-reported outcome following traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI). Specialized inpatient rehabilitation assists such patients in maximizing function and independence. Our project aim was to describe those patients receiving specialized rehabilitation after tSCI in Canada, and to determine if such rehabilitation improved the likelihood of returning home. This cohort study utilized data from the Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry (RHSCIR) to identify patients with tSCI discharged from 1 of 18 participating acute specialized spine facilities between 2011 and 2015 to either 1 of 13 participating specialized rehabilitation facilities, or to another discharge destination. To determine if specialized rehabilitation affected likelihood of returning home, multiple logistic regressions and propensity score matchings were performed to account for age at injury, gender, neurological severity and level, acute length of stay (LOS), and region of residence. The χ2 test was used to compare rate of return home between matched groups. Of the 1599 patients included, 71% received specialized rehabilitation. Receiving specialized rehabilitation was a significant and strong predictor of return to home after controlling for covariates (adjusted odds ratio = 3.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6-5.9). The rate of return to home was significantly higher in the matched rehabilitation group than the no rehabilitation group (98% vs. 87%, p = 0.0004). For the matched patients, an extra 11 patients returned home for every 100 patients receiving specialized rehabilitation. However, effect of age on returning home requires further investigation. Improving access to specialized rehabilitation could potentially reduce discharges to nursing homes or other non-home destinations.
AB - Return to living at home is an important patient-reported outcome following traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI). Specialized inpatient rehabilitation assists such patients in maximizing function and independence. Our project aim was to describe those patients receiving specialized rehabilitation after tSCI in Canada, and to determine if such rehabilitation improved the likelihood of returning home. This cohort study utilized data from the Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry (RHSCIR) to identify patients with tSCI discharged from 1 of 18 participating acute specialized spine facilities between 2011 and 2015 to either 1 of 13 participating specialized rehabilitation facilities, or to another discharge destination. To determine if specialized rehabilitation affected likelihood of returning home, multiple logistic regressions and propensity score matchings were performed to account for age at injury, gender, neurological severity and level, acute length of stay (LOS), and region of residence. The χ2 test was used to compare rate of return home between matched groups. Of the 1599 patients included, 71% received specialized rehabilitation. Receiving specialized rehabilitation was a significant and strong predictor of return to home after controlling for covariates (adjusted odds ratio = 3.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6-5.9). The rate of return to home was significantly higher in the matched rehabilitation group than the no rehabilitation group (98% vs. 87%, p = 0.0004). For the matched patients, an extra 11 patients returned home for every 100 patients receiving specialized rehabilitation. However, effect of age on returning home requires further investigation. Improving access to specialized rehabilitation could potentially reduce discharges to nursing homes or other non-home destinations.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031674462&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85031674462&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1089/neu.2016.4930
DO - 10.1089/neu.2016.4930
M3 - Article
C2 - 28447870
AN - SCOPUS:85031674462
SN - 0897-7151
VL - 34
SP - 2867
EP - 2876
JO - Journal of Neurotrauma
JF - Journal of Neurotrauma
IS - 20
ER -