Double-blind comparison of carbetocin versus oxytocin in preventing uterine atony post cesarean section

J. Dansereau, A. K. Joshi, M. E. Helewa, T. A. Doran, I. R. Lange, E. R. Luther, D. Farine, M. L. Schulz, G. L.A. Horbay, P. Griffin, W. Wassenaar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare carbetocin, a long-acting oxytocin analog, to oxytocin in the prevention of post-cesarean uterine atony. Material and methods: We enrolled 694 patients going for elective repeat cesarean in a Canadian multicentre double-blind randomized clinical trial. We compared the effect of a single dose of carbetocin (100 mcg.IV) to a standard 8 h IV infusion of oxytocin. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients requiring additional uterotonic drugs. The design used a sequential analysis using the double triangular test. Results: The overall uterotonic intervention rate was 7.4%. The odds of treatment failure was 2.0 times higher in the oxytocin group compared with the carbetocin group (respectively 10.1% vs. 4.7%, P < 0.05). Interim safety analysis shows carbetocin to be well tolerated with a safety profile similar to oxytocin. Conclusion: Carbetocin, a new drug to prevent uterine atony, appears to be more effective than a continuous infusion of oxytocin in preventing uterine atony post-Cesarean.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)37
Number of pages1
JournalEuropean Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume69
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1996
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Double-blind comparison of carbetocin versus oxytocin in preventing uterine atony post cesarean section'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this