Abstract
Recreational fishing constitutes the dominant or sole use of many fish stocks, particularly in freshwater ecosystems in Western industrialized countries. However, despite their social and economic importance, recreational fisheries are generally guided by local or regional norms and standards, with few comprehensive policy and development frameworks existing across jurisdictions. We argue that adoption of a recently developed Global Code of Practice (CoP) for Recreational Fisheries can provide benefits for moving recreational fisheries toward sustainability on a global scale. The CoP is a voluntary document, specifically framed toward recreational fisheries practices and issues, thereby complementing and extending the United Nation's Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries by the Food and Agricultural Organization. The CoP for Recreational Fisheries describes the minimum standards of environmentally friendly, ethically appropriate, and-depending on local situations-socially acceptable recreational fishing and its management. Although many, if not all, of the provisions presented in the CoP are already addressed through national fisheries legislation and state-based fisheries management regulations in North America, adopting a common framework for best practices in recreational fisheries across multiple jurisdictions would further promote their long-term viability in the face of interjurisdictional angler movements and some expanding threats to the activity related to shifting sociopolitical norms.
Translated title of the contribution | Benefits and risks of adopting the Global Code of Practice for Recreational Fisheries |
---|---|
Original language | Spanish |
Pages (from-to) | 165-172 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Fisheries |
Volume | 37 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2012 |
Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:We thank R. van Anrooy (FAO), EIFAC experts and participants at the EIFAC workshop on the Code of Practice in Bilthoven, The Netherlands (November 2007, Figure 3), for their support and constructive feedback on the various drafts of the Code. Particular credit goes to A. Rothuis of the Dutch Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality and to F. Bloot of the Dutch Recreational Fishing Association for their financial and logistic support in hosting the workshop, as well as to the Irish Fisheries Board—particularly J. Caffrey—for partial funding of this project. Additional funding was also provided through the ADAPTFISH project (www.adaptfish.igb-berlin. de) funded by the Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Community (Germany) through a grant to R.A. Funding for the finalization of this article was provided by the German Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF) within the project Besatzfisch (www.besatz-fisch.de) in the Program for Social–Ecological Research (#01UU0907). S.J.C. was supported by the Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation, the Canada Foundation for Innovation, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council, and the Canada Research Chairs Program. We thank three reviewers and the science editor for comments that helped improve our article.
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Aquatic Science
- Nature and Landscape Conservation