TY - JOUR
T1 - Empirically supported psychodynamic psychotherapy for common mental disorders–An update applying revised criteria
T2 - Systematic review protocol
AU - Leichsenring, Falk
AU - Abbass, Allan
AU - Heim, Nikolas
AU - Keefe, John R.
AU - Luyten, Patrick
AU - Rabung, Sven
AU - Steinert, Christiane
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2022 Leichsenring, Abbass, Heim, Keefe, Luyten, Rabung and Steinert.
PY - 2022/9/15
Y1 - 2022/9/15
N2 - The approach of evidence-based medicine has been extended to psychotherapy. More than 20 years ago, criteria for empirically supported psychotherapeutic treatments (ESTs) were defined. Meanwhile a new model for empirically supported psychotherapeutic treatments has been proposed. While the empirical status of psychodynamic therapy (PDT) was assessed in several reviews using the previous criteria, the proposed new model has not yet been applied to PDT. For this reason, we will carry out a systematic review on studies of PDT in common mental disorders applying the revised criteria of ESTs. As suggested by the new model we will focus on recent systematic quantitative reviews. A systematic search for meta-analyses on the efficacy of PDT in common mental disorders will be carried out. Meta-analyses will be selected and evaluated by at least two raters along the criteria of the new proposed model. In addition, systematic reviews and individual studies addressing mechanisms of change in PDT, effectiveness under real-world conditions, cost-effectiveness and adverse events will be systematically searched for and evaluated. Finally, quality of evidence, the extent to which benefits exceed harms and strength of recommendations will be assessed per disorder using GRADE.
AB - The approach of evidence-based medicine has been extended to psychotherapy. More than 20 years ago, criteria for empirically supported psychotherapeutic treatments (ESTs) were defined. Meanwhile a new model for empirically supported psychotherapeutic treatments has been proposed. While the empirical status of psychodynamic therapy (PDT) was assessed in several reviews using the previous criteria, the proposed new model has not yet been applied to PDT. For this reason, we will carry out a systematic review on studies of PDT in common mental disorders applying the revised criteria of ESTs. As suggested by the new model we will focus on recent systematic quantitative reviews. A systematic search for meta-analyses on the efficacy of PDT in common mental disorders will be carried out. Meta-analyses will be selected and evaluated by at least two raters along the criteria of the new proposed model. In addition, systematic reviews and individual studies addressing mechanisms of change in PDT, effectiveness under real-world conditions, cost-effectiveness and adverse events will be systematically searched for and evaluated. Finally, quality of evidence, the extent to which benefits exceed harms and strength of recommendations will be assessed per disorder using GRADE.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85139046113&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85139046113&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.976885
DO - 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.976885
M3 - Review article
C2 - 36186863
AN - SCOPUS:85139046113
SN - 1664-0640
VL - 13
JO - Frontiers in Psychiatry
JF - Frontiers in Psychiatry
M1 - 976885
ER -