Evaluating a palliative care program: Methodology and limitations

Hilary Jarvis, Frederick I. Burge, Chris A. Scott

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The article describes an evaluation of a palliative care service in a regional and tertiary care facility. The service components are described. The four outcomes chosen for evaluation were: (a) symptom relief; (b) satisfaction with care for patients/families; (c) utilization of community resources; (d) good nursing morale and low staff stress. Quality of life was measured using a symptom distress scale; satisfaction using an adapted Kristjanson FAMCARE scale; community resources with opinion and satisfaction surveys; and staff morale and stress with the Maslach Burnout Inventory and Latack's Coping Questionnaire. Results showed that overall symptom distress was reduced. Patients/families were generally satisfied, with some areas needing attention. Physicians were generally satisfied and believed patients/families benefited from the psychosocial support, respite, and education/information. Nurses felt they had the time, energy, resources and support to give quality care.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)23-33
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Palliative Care
Volume12
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1996

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating a palliative care program: Methodology and limitations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Jarvis, H., Burge, F. I., & Scott, C. A. (1996). Evaluating a palliative care program: Methodology and limitations. Journal of Palliative Care, 12(2), 23-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/082585979601200206