Evaluating and Improving the Quality of Survey Data From Panel and Crowd-Sourced Samples: A Practical Guide for Psychological Research

Jacob Belliveau, Igor Yakovenko

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The use of crowd-sourced and panel survey data in addiction research has become widespread. However, the validity of data obtained from newer panels such asQualtrics has not been extensively evaluated. Furthermore, few addiction researchers appear to employ previously recommended guidelines for maximizing the quality of data obtained from panel samples. The goals of the present study were as follows: (a) to evaluate the quality of survey data obtained from Qualtrics including an evaluation of the company’s internal data screening process and (b) to provide a practical implementation guide for data screening practices that maximize the quality of data obtained via panel and crowd-sourced samples. To address the goals, two panel samples evaluating vaping and video gaming behaviors were recruited in Canada via Qualtrics and underwent Qualtrics’s internal data screening process before being rigorously rescreened by the authors. The results demonstrate that while Qualtrics’s paid internal data quality process flags and removes many low-quality participants, there is still a large portion of participants presented by Qualtrics as high-quality that are likely low-quality responses that need to be screened out. The presented methodology provides a rigorous data screening protocol, including step-by-step application, for crowd-sourced samples in addictive behavior research for maximizing data quality. Researchers should be cautious in the use of Qualtrics data for administration of addiction survey research and are encouraged to use additional data screening procedures to maximize data quality.

Original languageEnglish
JournalExperimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This research was not supported by any funding source. The authors have no known conflicts of interest to disclose

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 American Psychological Association

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Pharmacology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Pharmacology (medical)

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating and Improving the Quality of Survey Data From Panel and Crowd-Sourced Samples: A Practical Guide for Psychological Research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this