Evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia

Peter Dodek, Sean Keenan, Deborah Cook, Daren Heyland, Michael Jacka, Lori Hand, John Muscedere, Debra Foster, Nav Mehta, Richard Hall, Christian Brun-Buisson

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

427 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is an important patient safety issue in critically ill patients. Purpose: To develop an evidence-based guideline for the prevention of VAP. Data Sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Study Selection: The authors systematically searched for relevant randomized, controlled trials and systematic reviews that involved mechanically ventilated adults and were published before 1 April 2003. Data Extraction: Physical, positional, and pharmacologic interventions that may influence the development of VAP were considered. Independently and in duplicate, the authors scored the validity of trials; the effect size and confidence intervals; the homogeneity of results; and safety, feasibility, and economic issues. Data Synthesis: Recommended: The orotracheal route of intubation, changes of ventilator circuits only for each new patient and if the circuits are soiled, use of closed endotracheal suction systems that are changed for each new patient and as clinically indicated, heat and moisture exchangers in the absence of contraindications, weekly changes of heat and moisture exchangers, and semi-recumbent positioning in the absence of contraindications. Consider subglottic secretion drainage and kinetic beds. Not recommended: Sucralfate to prevent VAP in patients at high risk for gastrointestinal bleeding and topical antibiotics to prevent VAP. Because of insufficient or conflicting evidence, no recommendations were made about systematically searching for maxillary sinusitis, chest physiotherapy, the timing of tracheostomy, prone positioning, prophylactic intravenous antibiotics, or intravenous plus topical antibiotics. Limitations: No formal economic analysis was performed, and patient perspectives were not considered. Conclusion: If effectively implemented, this guideline may decrease the morbidity, mortality, and costs of VAP in mechanically ventilated patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)305-313
Number of pages9
JournalAnnals of Internal Medicine
Volume141
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 17 2004

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Internal Medicine

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Guideline
  • Journal Article
  • Practice Guideline
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this