TY - JOUR
T1 - Factors Associated With a Successful External Cephalic Version in the Esarly ECV Trial
AU - Early External Cephalic Version Trial Collaborators Group
AU - Hutton, Eileen K.
AU - Saunders, Carolyn A.
AU - Tu, Maobing
AU - Stoll, Kathrin
AU - Berkowitz, Jonathan
AU - Hannah, Mary E.
AU - Hodnett, Ellen D.
AU - Amankwah, Kofi
AU - Kaufman, Karyn
AU - Malott, Anne
AU - Parkin, Diane
AU - Aubin, Susan
AU - Dean, Sharon
AU - Windrim, Rory
AU - Bernstein, E. Paul
AU - Salenieks, Mary Ellen
AU - Mahmoud, Haidar
AU - Gilmore, Alison
AU - Scheufler, Peter
AU - Cowal, Catherine
AU - Buss, Gail
AU - Kung, Rose
AU - Pollard, Jeffrey
AU - Swaby, Cheryl
AU - Carson, George D.
AU - Elliott, Sally
AU - Parish, Barbara
AU - Fanning, Cora
AU - Demianczuk, Nestor
AU - Penttinen, Elizabeth
AU - Turbide, Manon
AU - Desautels, Pascale
AU - Le, Quynh
AU - Van Os, Mary Ann
AU - Osler, William
AU - Kulkarni, Ramesh
AU - Laplante, Joanne
AU - Lawley, Ruth
AU - Tuffnell, Derek
AU - West, Jane
AU - Crowther, Caroline
AU - Simon, David
AU - Myers, Bernadette
AU - Reddick, Jenny
AU - Child, Andrew
AU - Peat, Brian
AU - Phipps, Hala
AU - McCahon, Ian
AU - Koszalka, Michael
AU - Coonrod, Dean
N1 - Funding Information:
The Early External Cephalic Version Trial was supported by Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) grant No. MT-15223.
Funding Information:
E. K. Hutton is supported by a CIHR Research New Investigator Award and a Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research Scholar Award.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2008 Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada.
PY - 2008
Y1 - 2008
N2 - Objectives: The objective of this research was to determine factors that were associated with a successful external cephalic version (ECV) procedure. Methods: We undertook a secondary analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial, The Early External Cephalic Version (Pilot) Trial. In this secondary analysis, we included data for the subset of 178 women who had an ECV as part of the pilot trial (123 nulliparous women with any breech presentation and 55 multiparous women with a frank breech presentation only). Using this dataset, we began with two separate univariate analyses, one of characteristics that could be determined before undertaking a procedure, and the other of factors associated with the ECV procedure itself. Variables that had a P value of ≤0.1 in the univariate analyses were included in two separate logistic regression models, one for preprocedural and one for procedural factors, using a backward elimination approach. Results: Multiparity and a non-engaged presenting part were significant preprocedural predictors of ECV success. Procedural factors predictive of ECV success included lower reported maternal pain scores during the procedure, a single attempt at ECV, and a more mobile fetus. Conclusion: Non-engagement of the presenting part was the only modifiable factor predicting ECV success that was identified in this analysis, and it supports the hypothesis that beginning the ECV procedure earlier in pregnancy, prior to engagement, may have merit. The Early ECV 2 Trial is in progress and will further test this hypothesis.
AB - Objectives: The objective of this research was to determine factors that were associated with a successful external cephalic version (ECV) procedure. Methods: We undertook a secondary analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial, The Early External Cephalic Version (Pilot) Trial. In this secondary analysis, we included data for the subset of 178 women who had an ECV as part of the pilot trial (123 nulliparous women with any breech presentation and 55 multiparous women with a frank breech presentation only). Using this dataset, we began with two separate univariate analyses, one of characteristics that could be determined before undertaking a procedure, and the other of factors associated with the ECV procedure itself. Variables that had a P value of ≤0.1 in the univariate analyses were included in two separate logistic regression models, one for preprocedural and one for procedural factors, using a backward elimination approach. Results: Multiparity and a non-engaged presenting part were significant preprocedural predictors of ECV success. Procedural factors predictive of ECV success included lower reported maternal pain scores during the procedure, a single attempt at ECV, and a more mobile fetus. Conclusion: Non-engagement of the presenting part was the only modifiable factor predicting ECV success that was identified in this analysis, and it supports the hypothesis that beginning the ECV procedure earlier in pregnancy, prior to engagement, may have merit. The Early ECV 2 Trial is in progress and will further test this hypothesis.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=41149175633&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=41149175633&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)32709-8
DO - 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)32709-8
M3 - Article
C2 - 18198064
AN - SCOPUS:41149175633
SN - 1701-2163
VL - 30
SP - 23
EP - 28
JO - Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada
JF - Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada
IS - 1
ER -