Fluid Resuscitation with 5% albumin versus Normal Saline in Early Septic Shock: A pilot randomized, controlled trial

Lauralyn A. McIntyre, Dean A. Fergusson, Deborah J. Cook, Brian H. Rowe, Sean M. Bagshaw, Dave Easton, Marcel Emond, Simon Finfer, Alison Fox-Robichaud, Claude Gaudert, Robert Green, Paul Hebert, John Marshall, Nigel Rankin, Ian Stiell, Alan Tinmouth, Joe Pagliarello, Alexis F. Turgeon, Andrew Worster, Ryan Zarychanski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Randomized, controlled trials of fluid resuscitation in early septic shock face many logistic challenges. We describe the Fluid Resuscitation with 5% albumin versus Normal Saline in Early Septic Shock (PRECISE) pilot trial study design and report feasibility of patient recruitment. Materials and Methods: Six Canadian academic centers enrolled adult patients with early suspected septic shock from the emergency department and intensive care unit department. Consent was deferred. Using concealed allocation, participants were randomized to either 5% albumin or 0.9% sodium chloride. Blinded fluid resuscitation started immediately and continued for 7 days in the intensive care unit. Target recruitment was established a priori at 2 patients per site per month. Results: Fifty-one patients were enrolled; 50 patients received study fluid. We recruited a median of 2.5 patients (interquartile range [IQR], 1.5-3.0) per site per month into the trial. Median age and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores were 64.5 (IQR, 55.0-78.0) and 25.0 (IQR, 20.0-29.0), respectively. Most patients (n = 37 [74.0%]) were enrolled from the emergency department for a median of 1.6 hours (IQR, 0.8-3.5 hours) from their first hypotensive event and received a median of 2.4 L (IQR, 1.5-3.0 L) of resuscitation fluid before inclusion. Consent was deferred for 44 patients (89.8%). Conclusions: Patient recruitment into the PRECISE pilot trial met our prespecified feasibility targets, and the PRECISE team is planning the larger trial.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)317.e1-317.e6
JournalJournal of Critical Care
Volume27
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2012
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Dr McIntyre holds a joint New Investigator award from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) and Canadian Blood Services. Dr Fergusson holds a New Investigator award from CIHR. Drs Rowe and Cook are supported by the 21st Century Canada Research Chairs program through the CIHR and the Government of Canada (Ottawa, Ontario, Canada). Dr Stiell holds a Distinguished Professorship and University Health Research Chair from the University of Ottawa. Dr Turgeon holds a Research Career Award from the Fonds de la Recherche en Santé du Québec.

Funding Information:
Conflicts of Interest: Dr McIntyre received joint funding from the Canadian Institute of Health Research and CSL Behring to hold 2 PRECISE planning meetings. Dr Finfer received partial funding for the SAFE trial and travel funding for industry sponsored and academic meetings from CSL Behring.

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article
  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Fluid Resuscitation with 5% albumin versus Normal Saline in Early Septic Shock: A pilot randomized, controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this