Abstract
Background: Frailty is associated with early postoperative outcomes. How frailty influences long-term postoperative recovery is poorly described. Our objective was to evaluate the association of frailty with postoperative disability trajectories in the year after surgery. Methods: Prespecified 1-yr follow-up of a prospective multicentre cohort study. Patients ≥65 yr were assessed for frailty before major elective noncardiac surgery (Clinical Frailty Scale [CFS] and Fried Phenotype [FP]). The primary outcome was patient-reported disability score (using the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0) at baseline, 30, 90, and 365 days after surgery. Repeated measures linear regression estimated the association of preoperative frailty with changes in disability scores over time, adjusted for procedure. Group-based trajectory modelling was used to identify subgroup trajectories of people with frailty. Results: One-year follow-up was complete for 687/702 (97.9%) participants. Frailty was associated with a significant difference in disability trajectory (P<0.0001). Compared with baseline, people with frailty experienced a decrease in disability score at 365 days (CFS frailty: −7.3 points, 95% confidence interval [CI] −10.2 to −4.5); (FP frailty: −5.4 points, 95% CI −8.5 to −2.3); people without frailty had no significant change in their disability score from baseline (no CFS frailty: +0.8 points, 95% CI −1.7 to 3.2; no FP frailty: +1.1 points, 95% CI −3.5 to 1.3). More than one-third of people with frailty experienced an early increase in disability before achieving a net decrease in disability. Conclusions: Decision-making and care planning should integrate the possible trade-offs between early adverse outcomes with longer-term benefit when frailty is present in older surgical patients.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 704-711 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | British Journal of Anaesthesia |
Volume | 125 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Nov 2020 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:PEB reports personal fees from Corin, personal fees from MicroPort, personal fees from Zimmer Biomet, personal fees from Medacta, personal fees from MatOrtho, grants from Zimmer Biomet, outside the submitted work. LTL reports grants and personal fees from Sanofi, personal fees from Ferring, outside the submitted work. The remaining authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.The Canadian Frailty Network and The Ottawa Hospital Academic Medical Organization through peer-reviewed grants. Funders played no role in design, execution or reporting. DIM was supported by the Canadian Anesthesiologist's Society Career Scientist Award, the University of Ottawa's Junior Clinical Research Chair Award and salary support from The Ottawa Hospital Anesthesiology Alternate Funds Association.
Funding Information:
PEB reports personal fees from Corin , personal fees from MicroPort , personal fees from Zimmer Biomet , personal fees from Medacta , personal fees from MatOrtho , grants from Zimmer Biomet , outside the submitted work. LTL reports grants and personal fees from Sanofi , personal fees from Ferring , outside the submitted work. The remaining authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 British Journal of Anaesthesia
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine