Abstract
Background: Microalbuminuria screening to identify patients at risk of diabetic nephropathy is widely accepted. Aim: To investigate whether blood-pressure-based strategies can identify such patients without the need for microalbuminuria testing. Methods: Spot urine for albumin/creatinine ratios was performed in all patients over an 18-month period. The performance of four combinations of clinical models, based on existing triggers for antihypertensive intervention (prior use and/or existing systolic BP exceeding 140 or 160 mmHg and/or dipstick proteinuria exceeding 1+ or 2+) was evaluated at microalbuminuria thresholds of 3.5 and 10 mg/mmol. The models were ranked 1 to 4, based on their escalating relative strengths in predicting need for intervention. Results: Of 3748 patients, 1257 (34%) or 739 (20%) exceeded microalbuminuria thresholds of 3.5 or 10 mg/mmol. All four models predicted microalbuminuria risk (areas under ROC curves 0.60-0.77, all p < 0.001). The models (1-4) identified 2220, 2465, 2803 or 2937 for intervention, respectively, irrespective of microalbuminuria status, and missed 368, 232, 194 or 126 at 3.5 mg/mmol and 164, 87, 81 or 45 at 10 mg/mmol. Discussion: Clinical models using routinely measured parameters reduced the target population for microalbuminuria screening by 60-80%, missing 3-10% of patients with albumin/creatinine ratios exceeding 3.5 mg/mmol or 1-4% of those exceeding 10 mg/mmol.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 427-433 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | QJM - Monthly Journal of the Association of Physicians |
Volume | 98 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jun 2005 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:This study was supported by a grant from the South Staffordshire Medical Foundation, UK.
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- General Medicine
PubMed: MeSH publication types
- Journal Article
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't