Impact of the CARD (Comfort Ask Relax Distract) system on school-based vaccinations: A cluster randomized trial

Anna Taddio, Victoria Gudzak, Marlene Jantzi, Charlotte Logeman, Lucie M. Bucci, Noni E. MacDonald, Rahim Moineddin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The CARD (Comfort Ask Relax Distract) system is a vaccine delivery framework that integrates evidence-based interventions to reduce stress-related responses and improve the vaccination experience for children undergoing vaccinations at school. In preliminary studies, CARD was acceptable and effective. The objective was to evaluate CARD in a large, pragmatic trial to confirm its effectiveness in real-world settings. Methods: Hybrid effectiveness-implementation cluster randomized trial in schools receiving vaccination services from Wellington-Dufferin-Guelph Public Health. Forty schools with grade 7 students (12 years old) were randomized to CARD and control (n = 20/group). Nurses in CARD schools planned clinics with principals and educated students about CARD ahead of time. Principals disseminated information to staff and parents and sent reminders. Vaccination day processes minimized fear and facilitated student self-selected coping strategies. Nurses in control schools followed usual practices, which excluded principal meetings, education, reminders, and systematic integration of fear-reducing or child-selected coping strategies. Outcomes included stress-related symptoms (fear – primary outcome, pain, dizziness, fainting, post-vaccination reactions), use of coping interventions, vaccination uptake, attitudes and implementation outcomes (acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, fidelity). Results: Altogether, 1919 students were included. Fear and pain were lower in CARD schools: OR 0.65 (95% CI 0.47–0.90) and OR 0.62 (95% CI 0.50–0.77), respectively. No students fainted in CARD schools compared to 0.8% in control (p = 0.02). Dizziness and post-vaccination reactions did not differ. Student-led coping interventions were used more frequently in CARD schools. Vaccination uptake was 76.1% in CARD schools and 72.5% in control schools (OR 1.13 (95% CI 0.85–1.50)). Staff and students had positive attitudes about CARD and implementation outcomes; however, recommendations were made to improve fidelity. Discussion: CARD reduced stress-related responses in students undergoing vaccinations at school and was positively received by students and public health staff. CARD is recommended to improve the quality of vaccination delivery services. Trial registration: NCT03966300.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2802-2809
Number of pages8
JournalVaccine
Volume40
Issue number19
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 26 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This study was funded by a Public Health Agency of Canada Immunization Partnership Fund award (1920-HQ-000063) and a Canadian Institutes of Health Research Foundation Grant (FRN 159905) awarded to A. Taddio. The funding agencies had no input into the study.

Funding Information:
The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: A. Taddio reports a University of Toronto Section 9 Trademark No. 924835 for CARD™. LMB reports that Immunize Canada received grants from Pfizer Inc., Merck Canada, Sanofi Pasteur, Seqiris, and Glaxo-Smith-Kline unrelated to this work. The other authors declare they have no competing interests.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Molecular Medicine
  • General Immunology and Microbiology
  • General Veterinary
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Infectious Diseases

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of the CARD (Comfort Ask Relax Distract) system on school-based vaccinations: A cluster randomized trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this