Influence of age at implantation and of residual hearing on speech outcome measures after cochlear implantation: Binary partitioning analysis

Hamdy El-Hakim, Mohamed Abdolell, Richard J. Mount, Blake C. Papsin, Robert V. Harrison

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The goal of this study was to evaluate speech understanding outcomes in prelingually deaf children who use a cochlear implant device. Specifically, we discuss investigations on 2 prognostic variables - age at implantation and degree of residual hearing - and use a novel method: binary partitioning analysis. Our outcome measures are standard speech perception evaluations, including the Word Intelligibility by Picture Identification (WIPI) test, the Phonetically Balanced-Kindergarten (PBK) test, and the Glendonald Auditory Screening Procedure (GASP). Regarding age at implantation, we definitely showed that growth rates of speech understanding do relate to age at implantation, but not in a simple fashion. We used binary partitioning in an attempt to find the age at implantation that best separates the performances of children with younger versus older ages at implantation. We found that there is no one "critical age"; much appears to depend on the nature and difficulty (eg, whether open- or closed-set) of the test used. Regarding residual hearing, binary partitioning analysis was unable to show that the amount of residual hearing (as shown by preimplantation audiometric data) has any significant bearing on speech outcome measures in congenitally or prelingually deaf children.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)102-108
Number of pages7
JournalAnnals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology
Volume111
Issue number5 II
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2002
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Influence of age at implantation and of residual hearing on speech outcome measures after cochlear implantation: Binary partitioning analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this