TY - JOUR
T1 - Intrapatient study comparing 3D printed bolus versus standard vinyl gel sheet bolus for postmastectomy chest wall radiation therapy
AU - Robar, James L.
AU - Moran, Kathryn
AU - Allan, James
AU - Clancey, James
AU - Joseph, Tami
AU - Chytyk-Praznik, Krista
AU - MacDonald, R. Lee
AU - Lincoln, John
AU - Sadeghi, Parisa
AU - Rutledge, Robert
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 The Authors
PY - 2018/7/1
Y1 - 2018/7/1
N2 - Purpose: This patient study evaluated the use of 3-dimensional (3D) printed bolus for chest wall radiation therapy compared with standard sheet bolus with regard to accuracy of fit, surface dose measured in vivo, and efficiency of patient setup. By alternating bolus type over the course of therapy, each patient served as her own control. Methods and materials: For 16 patients undergoing chest wall radiation therapy, a custom 5.0 mm thick bolus was designed based on the treatment planning computed tomography scan and 3D printed using polylactic acid. Cone beam computed tomography scanning was used to image and quantify the accuracy of fit of the 2 bolus types with regard to air gaps between the bolus and skin. As a quality assurance measure for the 3D printed bolus, optically stimulated luminescent dosimetry provided in vivo comparison of surface dose at 7 points on the chest wall. Durations of patient setup and image guidance were recorded and compared. Results: In 13 of 16 patients, the bolus was printed without user intervention, and the median print time was 12.6 hours. The accuracy of fit of the bolus to the chest wall was improved significantly relative to standard sheet bolus, with the frequency of air gaps 5 mm or greater reduced from 30% to 13% (P <.001) and maximum air gap dimension diminished from 0.5 ± 0.3 to 0.3 ± 0.3 mm on average. Surface dose was within 3% for both standard sheet and 3D printed bolus. On average, the use of 3D printed bolus reduced the setup time from 104 to 76 seconds. Conclusions: This study demonstrates 3D printed bolus in postmastectomy radiation therapy improves fit of the bolus and reduces patient setup time marginally compared with standard vinyl gel sheet bolus. The time savings on patient setup must be weighed against the considerable time needed for the 3D printing process.
AB - Purpose: This patient study evaluated the use of 3-dimensional (3D) printed bolus for chest wall radiation therapy compared with standard sheet bolus with regard to accuracy of fit, surface dose measured in vivo, and efficiency of patient setup. By alternating bolus type over the course of therapy, each patient served as her own control. Methods and materials: For 16 patients undergoing chest wall radiation therapy, a custom 5.0 mm thick bolus was designed based on the treatment planning computed tomography scan and 3D printed using polylactic acid. Cone beam computed tomography scanning was used to image and quantify the accuracy of fit of the 2 bolus types with regard to air gaps between the bolus and skin. As a quality assurance measure for the 3D printed bolus, optically stimulated luminescent dosimetry provided in vivo comparison of surface dose at 7 points on the chest wall. Durations of patient setup and image guidance were recorded and compared. Results: In 13 of 16 patients, the bolus was printed without user intervention, and the median print time was 12.6 hours. The accuracy of fit of the bolus to the chest wall was improved significantly relative to standard sheet bolus, with the frequency of air gaps 5 mm or greater reduced from 30% to 13% (P <.001) and maximum air gap dimension diminished from 0.5 ± 0.3 to 0.3 ± 0.3 mm on average. Surface dose was within 3% for both standard sheet and 3D printed bolus. On average, the use of 3D printed bolus reduced the setup time from 104 to 76 seconds. Conclusions: This study demonstrates 3D printed bolus in postmastectomy radiation therapy improves fit of the bolus and reduces patient setup time marginally compared with standard vinyl gel sheet bolus. The time savings on patient setup must be weighed against the considerable time needed for the 3D printing process.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041956470&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85041956470&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.prro.2017.12.008
DO - 10.1016/j.prro.2017.12.008
M3 - Article
C2 - 29452866
AN - SCOPUS:85041956470
SN - 1879-8500
VL - 8
SP - 221
EP - 229
JO - Practical Radiation Oncology
JF - Practical Radiation Oncology
IS - 4
ER -