TY - JOUR
T1 - Investigation of test characteristics of two screening tools in comparison with a gold standard assessment to detect developmental delay at 36 months
T2 - A pilot study
AU - Currie, Lisa
AU - Dodds, Linda
AU - Shea, Sarah
AU - Flowerdew, Gordon
AU - McLean, Jennifer
AU - Walker, Robin
AU - Vincer, Michael
PY - 2012/12
Y1 - 2012/12
N2 - Background: The ability of the Rourke Baby Record (Rourke) and the Nipissing District Developmental Screen (NDDS) to detect developmental delay is not known. Objective: To determine the test characteristics of the Rourke and NDDS compared with the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development III for detecting developmental delay in high-risk children. Methods: Three-year-olds were recruited from the IWK Health Centre (Halifax, Nova Scotia). Two cut-points were evaluated (one and two or more areas of concern) from the Rourke and NDDS, and were compared with a score of ≤85 on the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development III. Results: The majority (67.7%) of the 31 participants reported no concern. At one area of concern, sensitivity was 75% for both the Rourke and NDDS. When two areas of concern were noted, specificity was 93% for the Rourke and 96% for NDDS. Conclusions: Both the Rourke and the NDDS appear to be reasonably sensitive and specific, but further investigation is warranted.
AB - Background: The ability of the Rourke Baby Record (Rourke) and the Nipissing District Developmental Screen (NDDS) to detect developmental delay is not known. Objective: To determine the test characteristics of the Rourke and NDDS compared with the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development III for detecting developmental delay in high-risk children. Methods: Three-year-olds were recruited from the IWK Health Centre (Halifax, Nova Scotia). Two cut-points were evaluated (one and two or more areas of concern) from the Rourke and NDDS, and were compared with a score of ≤85 on the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development III. Results: The majority (67.7%) of the 31 participants reported no concern. At one area of concern, sensitivity was 75% for both the Rourke and NDDS. When two areas of concern were noted, specificity was 93% for the Rourke and 96% for NDDS. Conclusions: Both the Rourke and the NDDS appear to be reasonably sensitive and specific, but further investigation is warranted.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872657228&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84872657228&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/pch/17.10.549
DO - 10.1093/pch/17.10.549
M3 - Article
C2 - 24294061
AN - SCOPUS:84872657228
SN - 1205-7088
VL - 17
SP - 549
EP - 552
JO - Paediatrics and Child Health
JF - Paediatrics and Child Health
IS - 10
ER -