Investigation of test characteristics of two screening tools in comparison with a gold standard assessment to detect developmental delay at 36 months: A pilot study

Lisa Currie, Linda Dodds, Sarah Shea, Gordon Flowerdew, Jennifer McLean, Robin Walker, Michael Vincer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The ability of the Rourke Baby Record (Rourke) and the Nipissing District Developmental Screen (NDDS) to detect developmental delay is not known. Objective: To determine the test characteristics of the Rourke and NDDS compared with the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development III for detecting developmental delay in high-risk children. Methods: Three-year-olds were recruited from the IWK Health Centre (Halifax, Nova Scotia). Two cut-points were evaluated (one and two or more areas of concern) from the Rourke and NDDS, and were compared with a score of ≤85 on the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development III. Results: The majority (67.7%) of the 31 participants reported no concern. At one area of concern, sensitivity was 75% for both the Rourke and NDDS. When two areas of concern were noted, specificity was 93% for the Rourke and 96% for NDDS. Conclusions: Both the Rourke and the NDDS appear to be reasonably sensitive and specific, but further investigation is warranted.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)549-552
Number of pages4
JournalPaediatrics and Child Health
Volume17
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2012

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Investigation of test characteristics of two screening tools in comparison with a gold standard assessment to detect developmental delay at 36 months: A pilot study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this