Abstract
Background: Lithium is the gold standard prophylactic treatment for bipolar disorder. Most clinical practice guidelines recommend regular calcium assessments as part of monitoring lithium treatment, but easy-to-implement specific management strategies in the event of abnormal calcium levels are lacking. Methods: Based on a narrative review of the effects of lithium on calcium and parathyroid hormone (PTH) homeostasis and its clinical implications, experts developed a step-by-step algorithm to guide the initial management of emergent hypercalcemia during lithium treatment. Results: In the event of albumin-corrected plasma calcium levels above the upper limit, PTH and calcium levels should be measured after two weeks. Measurement of PTH and calcium levels should preferably be repeated after one month in case of normal or high PTH level, and after one week in case of low PTH level, independently of calcium levels. Calcium levels above 2.8 mmol/l may require a more acute approach. If PTH and calcium levels are normalized, repeated measurements are suggested after six months. In case of persistent PTH and calcium abnormalities, referral to an endocrinologist is suggested since further examination may be needed. Conclusions: Standardized consensus driven management may diminish the potential risk of clinicians avoiding the use of lithium because of uncertainties about managing side-effects and consequently hindering some patients from receiving an optimal treatment.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 34 |
Journal | International Journal of Bipolar Disorders |
Volume | 10 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Dec 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:ZK has nothing to declare. PV has nothing to declare. RWL has within the last three years received speaker fees from Lundbeck, Janssen-Cilag and Teva, and fees from Janssen-Cilag for advisory board activity. SS has within the last three years received speakers fees from Lundbeck. ASH has nothing to declare. AY independent research is funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. AD has nothing to declare. BMO has nothing to declare. FS has received speaking fees for Janssen-Cilag, Aristo, Lundbeck, Servier and has acted as advisor to Janssen-Cilag and Lundbeck . GS has nothing to delclare . JR has nothing to declare . JP has nothing to declare . LVK has the last three years been a consultant for Lundbeck and Teva. LT has nothing to declare . MA has nothing to declare . MM has nothing to declare . PG has nothing to declare . PR has nothing to declare . TH has nothing to declare . UL has received research grants from BMBF, AFSP, BMG, ulinsky Foundation, Janssen-Cilag; honoraria for lecturing from Janssen-Cilag; honoraria for advisory board activity from Janssen-Cilag . VB has nothing to declare . MB has received research grants from Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF), and European Commission. He has received honoraria for lecturing from Aristo, Janssen-Cilag, Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, and Servier Deutschland. He has served as a consultant for Biogen, GH Research, Janssen-Cilag, Livanova, Novartis, and Sunovion. REN has within the last three years been an investigator for Compass Pharmaceuticals, Janssen-Cilag, Sage and Boehringer-Ingelheim for clinical trials, has received speaking fees from Lundbeck, Teva Pharmaceuticals, Janssen-Cilag and Otsuka Pharmaceuticals, and has acted as advisor to Lundbeck and Janssen-Cilag.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Biological Psychiatry
PubMed: MeSH publication types
- Journal Article