Abstract
Purpose:The purpose of the current study was to assess the penetrance of NRXN1 deletions.Methods:We compared the prevalence and genomic extent of NRXN1 deletions identified among 19,263 clinically referred cases to that of 15,264 controls. The burden of additional clinically relevant copy-number variations (CNVs) was used as a proxy to estimate the relative penetrance of NRXN1 deletions.Results:We identified 41 (0.21%) previously unreported exonic NRXN1 deletions ascertained for developmental delay/intellectual disability that were significantly greater than in controls (odds ratio (OR) = 8.14; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.91-22.72; P < 0.0001). Ten (22.7%) of these had a second clinically relevant CNV. Subjects with a deletion near the 3 end of NRXN1 were significantly more likely to have a second rare CNV than subjects with a 5 NRXN1 deletion (OR = 7.47; 95% CI: 2.36-23.61; P = 0.0006). The prevalence of intronic NRXN1 deletions was not statistically different between cases and controls (P = 0.618). The majority (63.2%) of intronic NRXN1 deletion cases had a second rare CNV at a prevalence twice as high as that for exonic NRXN1 deletion cases (P = 0.0035).Conclusions:The results support the importance of exons near the 5 end of NRXN1 in the expression of neurodevelopmental disorders. Intronic NRXN1 deletions do not appear to substantially increase the risk for clinical phenotypes.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 53-61 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Genetics in Medicine |
Volume | 19 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jan 1 2017 |
Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Genetics(clinical)