TY - JOUR
T1 - Monocular contribution to the peak time of the binocular pattern visual evoked potential
AU - McKerral, Michelle
AU - Lachapelle, Pierre
AU - Tremblay, François
AU - Polomeno, Robert C.
AU - Roy, Marie Sylvie
AU - Beneish, Raquel
AU - Leporé, Franco
PY - 1995/6
Y1 - 1995/6
N2 - The contribution of each monocular pathway to the timing of the binocular pattern visual evoked potential was assessed in situations where a significant interocular timing discrepancy was observed. Monocular and binocular pattern visual evoked potentials to 0.5° checks were recorded from normal subjects, normal subjects in whom one eye was blurred, patients with monocular amblyopia, and patients with resolved unilateral optic neuritis. Normal subjects showed facilitation, while suppression was evidenced in subjects with monocular blurring. In patients with amblyopia, the affected pathway had no effect on binocular pattern visual evoked potential latency, suggesting that the amblyopic eye was suppressed. In contrast, all patients with optic neuritis showed binocular averaging. Our results show that different forms of binocular interaction are evidenced in normal subjects, in amblyopia and in optic neuritis, and suggest that a comparative analysis of monocular and binocular pattern visual evoked potential peak times brings valuable information to the clinical evaluation that could be used to distinguish disease processes further.
AB - The contribution of each monocular pathway to the timing of the binocular pattern visual evoked potential was assessed in situations where a significant interocular timing discrepancy was observed. Monocular and binocular pattern visual evoked potentials to 0.5° checks were recorded from normal subjects, normal subjects in whom one eye was blurred, patients with monocular amblyopia, and patients with resolved unilateral optic neuritis. Normal subjects showed facilitation, while suppression was evidenced in subjects with monocular blurring. In patients with amblyopia, the affected pathway had no effect on binocular pattern visual evoked potential latency, suggesting that the amblyopic eye was suppressed. In contrast, all patients with optic neuritis showed binocular averaging. Our results show that different forms of binocular interaction are evidenced in normal subjects, in amblyopia and in optic neuritis, and suggest that a comparative analysis of monocular and binocular pattern visual evoked potential peak times brings valuable information to the clinical evaluation that could be used to distinguish disease processes further.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029553477&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029553477&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/BF01203697
DO - 10.1007/BF01203697
M3 - Article
C2 - 8813497
AN - SCOPUS:0029553477
SN - 0012-4486
VL - 91
SP - 181
EP - 193
JO - Documenta Ophthalmologica
JF - Documenta Ophthalmologica
IS - 2
ER -