Abstract
Proximity and size of the nearest market (‘market gravity’) have been shown to have strong negative effects on coral reef fish communities that can be mitigated by the establishment of closed areas. However, moray eels are functionally unique predators that are generally not subject to targeted fishing and should therefore not directly be affected by these factors. We used baited remote underwater video systems to investigate associations between morays and anthropogenic, habitat, and ecological factors in the Caribbean region. Market gravity had a positive effect on morays, while the opposite pattern was observed in a predator group subject to exploitation (sharks). Environmental DNA analyses corroborated the positive effect of market gravity on morays. We hypothesize that the observed pattern could be the indirect result of the depletion of moray competitors and predators near humans. Environmental science; ecology; biological sciences; zoology; animals; ethology
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 102097 |
Journal | iScience |
Volume | 24 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Mar 19 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:This work is a contribution of the Global FinPrint Project funded by the Paul G. Allen Family Foundation (grant number 11861) and the Shark Conservation Fund. Earthwatch Institute, Moore Bahamas Foundation, Reuter Foundation, Waitt Foundation, and the Moore Family Foundation also provided support. We are grateful to the many staff, students, and volunteers who contributed to BRUVS and eDNA collection and video annotation and Mathew Wyatt for the use of BenthoBox. We thank Joseph Craine, Jessica Devitt, and Vasco Elbrecht from Jonah Ventures. This is contribution #201 from the Coastlines and Oceans Division of the Institute of Environment at Florida International University. D.D.C. and K.I.F. conceived the BRUVS moray study. D.D.C. M.R.H. E.S.H. M.H. C.A.S. M.A.M, and M.G.M. led Global FinPrint. D.D.C. B.D.P. and J.B. conceived of the eDNA study. All authors contributed to the design and execution of Global FinPrint and/or eDNA sampling. J.B. and B.D.P. conducted eDNA laboratory work and eDNA bioinformatics. BRUVS modeling was conducted by G.M.C. with guidance from E.A.B. eDNA modeling was conducted by K.I.F. with guidance from E.A.B. The manuscript was initially written by G.M.C. J.B. and D.D.C. All authors read and commented on the manuscript. The authors declare no competing interests.
Funding Information:
This work is a contribution of the Global FinPrint Project funded by the Paul G. Allen Family Foundation (grant number 11861 ) and the Shark Conservation Fund. Earthwatch Institute , Moore Bahamas Foundation , Reuter Foundation , Waitt Foundation , and the Moore Family Foundation also provided support. We are grateful to the many staff, students, and volunteers who contributed to BRUVS and eDNA collection and video annotation and Mathew Wyatt for the use of BenthoBox. We thank Joseph Craine, Jessica Devitt, and Vasco Elbrecht from Jonah Ventures. This is contribution #201 from the Coastlines and Oceans Division of the Institute of Environment at Florida International University.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- General
PubMed: MeSH publication types
- Journal Article