Nuclear position dictates DNA repair pathway choice

Charlène Lemaître, Anastazja Grabarz, Katerina Tsouroula, Leonid Andronov, Audrey Furst, Tibor Pankotai, Vincent Heyer, Mélanie Rogier, Kathleen M. Attwood, Pascal Kessler, Graham Dellaire, Bruno Klaholz, Bernardo Reina-San-Martin, Evi Soutoglou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

156 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Faithful DNA repair is essential to avoid chromosomal rearrangements and promote genome integrity. Nuclear organization has emerged as a key parameter in the formation of chromosomal translocations, yet little is known as to whether DNA repair can efficiently occur throughout the nucleus and whether it is affected by the location of the lesion. Here, we induce DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) at different nuclear compartments and follow their fate. We demonstrate that DSBs induced at the nuclear membrane (but not at nuclear pores or nuclear interior) fail to rapidly activate the DNA damage response (DDR) and repair by homologous recombination (HR). Real-time and superresolution imaging reveal that DNA DSBs within lamina-associated domains do not migrate to more permissive environments for HR, like the nuclear pores or the nuclear interior, but instead are repaired in situ by alternative end-joining. Our results are consistent with a model in which nuclear position dictates the choice of DNA repair pathway, thus revealing a new level of regulation in DSB repair controlled by spatial organization of DNA within the nucleus.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2450-2463
Number of pages14
JournalGenes and Development
Volume28
Issue number22
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 15 2014

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 Lemaître et al.

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Genetics
  • Developmental Biology

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Nuclear position dictates DNA repair pathway choice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this