Abstract
The Neonatal Oxygenation Prospective Meta-analysis combined the individual participant data of 4965 extremely preterm infants. They had been randomly assigned in 5 trials to arterial oxygen saturations of 85%–89% or 91%–95% using modified oximeters to mask the treatment allocation. The primary outcome of death or disability did not differ significantly between the groups. Assignment to the higher target range reduced the risks of death and severe necrotizing enterocolitis but increased the risk of treated retinopathy. Trade-offs between the benefits and risks of higher or lower saturation targets should be informed by the local patient risks and institutional rates for outcomes that may be affected by a policy change. Features of the oximeter masking algorithm introduced unanticipated artifacts into the saturation display that are not seen in routine care. NeOProM provides little guidance on where to set the oximeter alarms and how to respond to them.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 101080 |
Journal | Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine |
Volume | 25 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Apr 2020 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:The Canadian Oxygen Trial (COT) was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, grant MCT-79217. We thank Robin S Roberts for his valuable input and critical review of this manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health