Abstract
Interactions between nestling birds and their parents are models for examining parent-offspring communication and sibling competition. Most studies have focused on species where young are restricted to a nest. However, offspring of many species are mobile and fed by parents for an extended period post-hatch. These chicks' mobility may provide an opportunity to examine the role of signalling and physical competition on parental feeding decisions. We examined parental provisioning rules in relation to offspring behaviour and hatching order (i.e., competitive ability) in a species with mobile young, the common tern. We determined that about 95% of feedings were directed to the first chick to reach the parent when it landed with food. We developed a probabilistic model to predict the likelihood of a chick reaching the parent first, and thus receiving food. Our model showed that begging intensity, feeding history, and the interaction between begging intensity and relative proximity to the parent best predicted which chick would arrive first. Increased begging was associated with arriving first significantly more when a chick was relatively further from the parent than when it was closer than its siblings. Independently of these factors, larger, earlier-hatched chicks were more likely to be fed than smaller, later-hatched chicks. Additional analyses showed that parents landed closer to more intensively begging chicks, however, increased begging did not explain the advantage of earlier-hatched chicks because begging intensity did not vary with hatching order. Instead, earlier-hatched chicks were more likely to outrun later-hatched siblings and reach the parent first.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 456-465 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology |
Volume | 58 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Sept 2005 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:Acknowledgments We are grateful to Melanie Ball, Alayna Kruger and Sarah Chisholm for field assistance, and to Andy Horn, Colleen Barber, Cindy Staicer and Andrew Boyne for help at different stages in the study. We also thank Andy Horn for reading drafts of the manuscript and the Canadian Wildlife Service and the Nova Scotia Department of Natural Resources for logistical support. This study was funded by a NSERC post-graduate scholarship and Patrick Lett Bursary to T.E.S. and a NSERC Discovery Grant to M.L.L. This study complied with animal care regulations of both Dalhousie University’s Animal Care Committee and of the Canadian Wildlife Service
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Animal Science and Zoology