TY - JOUR
T1 - Quality Indicators for the Diagnosis and Management of Menière's Disease
AU - Cottrell, Justin
AU - Yip, Jonathan
AU - Agrawal, Sumit
AU - Archibald, Jason
AU - Chau, Justin
AU - Lea, Jane
AU - Lin, Vincent
AU - Mick, Paul
AU - Morris, David
AU - Parnes, Lorne
AU - Schramm, David
AU - Chan, Yvonne
AU - Crowson, Matthew
AU - De Almeida, John
AU - Eskander, Antoine
AU - Witterick, Ian J.
AU - Monteiro, Eric
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/9/1
Y1 - 2021/9/1
N2 - Objective:Menière's disease (MD) is a clinical disorder that often provides challenges in diagnosis and management. High-quality evidence to guide care providers is sparse, which can result in significant practice variations. Quality indicators (QIs) are one method that can be used to standardize and measure accepted care practices to improve healthcare quality and patient outcomes. Here, we developed practical, high-yield QIs that serve to measure and inform the quality of care provided to patients with MD.Study Design:Modified RAND Corporation University of California, Los Angeles appropriateness methodology for QI development.Setting:Multicenter nine-member expert panel.Patients:NA.Interventions:NA.Main Outcome Measure:Final QIs deemed appropriate measures of quality care with agreement by the expert panel.Results:Twenty-seven candidate indicators were identified after literature review. After the first round of evaluations, the panel agreed on three candidate indicators as appropriate QIs. A subsequent expert panel meeting provided a platform to discuss disagreements. Two agreed-upon QIs were revised during this discussion before final evaluations. The expert panel ultimately agreed upon five QIs as appropriate measures of high-quality care after completing final evaluations and reviewing updated literature. The five quality indicators measure audiometric documentation, minimization of electrocochleography, use of intratympanic dexamethasone, use of intratympanic gentamycin, and rate of labyrinthectomy/vestibular neurectomy in refractory MD patient.Conclusions:This study proposes five QIs that cover key aspects of care for MD, such as accurate diagnosis and management options including initial destructive therapies. These QIs can serve multiple purposes, the most important of which is to galvanize quality improvement initiatives.
AB - Objective:Menière's disease (MD) is a clinical disorder that often provides challenges in diagnosis and management. High-quality evidence to guide care providers is sparse, which can result in significant practice variations. Quality indicators (QIs) are one method that can be used to standardize and measure accepted care practices to improve healthcare quality and patient outcomes. Here, we developed practical, high-yield QIs that serve to measure and inform the quality of care provided to patients with MD.Study Design:Modified RAND Corporation University of California, Los Angeles appropriateness methodology for QI development.Setting:Multicenter nine-member expert panel.Patients:NA.Interventions:NA.Main Outcome Measure:Final QIs deemed appropriate measures of quality care with agreement by the expert panel.Results:Twenty-seven candidate indicators were identified after literature review. After the first round of evaluations, the panel agreed on three candidate indicators as appropriate QIs. A subsequent expert panel meeting provided a platform to discuss disagreements. Two agreed-upon QIs were revised during this discussion before final evaluations. The expert panel ultimately agreed upon five QIs as appropriate measures of high-quality care after completing final evaluations and reviewing updated literature. The five quality indicators measure audiometric documentation, minimization of electrocochleography, use of intratympanic dexamethasone, use of intratympanic gentamycin, and rate of labyrinthectomy/vestibular neurectomy in refractory MD patient.Conclusions:This study proposes five QIs that cover key aspects of care for MD, such as accurate diagnosis and management options including initial destructive therapies. These QIs can serve multiple purposes, the most important of which is to galvanize quality improvement initiatives.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85114522668&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85114522668&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003206
DO - 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003206
M3 - Article
C2 - 34191782
AN - SCOPUS:85114522668
SN - 1531-7129
VL - 42
SP - E1084-E1092
JO - Otology and Neurotology
JF - Otology and Neurotology
IS - 8
ER -