Abstract
Children today spend less time in nature than previous generations and there is concern that this shift negatively impacts children’s cognitive abilities, particularly their ability to direct their attention. Theories, such as the Attention Restoration Theory (ART), suggest that contact with nature may replenish endogenous attention (e.g., directed, voluntary attention). There is a lack of rigorous research on how contact with nature is associated with attentional performance in children. This study employed a quasi-experimental design and included a sample of typically developing children to investigate performance on computerized endogenous and exogenous attention tasks before and after exposure to one of two interventions – a 30-min walk in either an urban (n = 30) or natural (forested, n = 30) environment. The two experimental groups were equivalent with regard to sex ratio, age, IQ, and connectedness to nature. Attention was assessed using the Combined Attention Systems Test (CAST), a state-of-the-art assessment tool designed to evaluate exogenous and endogenous attention characteristics. Bayesian hierarchical modeling of both response time (RT) and error rate (ER) was employed to evaluate the fixed effect of attentional measures and interactions with session and group. Consistent with predictions of ART, results support credible effects of the nature intervention on two measures of endogenous attention: Alerting RT: d = 0.85 (95% CI: 0.21–1.8), Orienting ER: d = 1.45 (95% CI: 0.17–7.18), but not on any of the measures of exogenous attention. Clinical Trial Registration:https://www.isrctn.com/, identifier ISRCTN17762011.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 2652 |
Journal | Frontiers in Psychology |
Volume | 10 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Dec 5 2019 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:The authors thank the parents and children who participated in the study. They would also like to thank the Shubenacadie Canal Commission for letting them use their meeting spaces to facilitate post-exposure testing and the reviewers for their insightful and helpful comments on the manuscript. Funding. This research was funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) Insight Development Grant (430-2012-0556).
Funding Information:
This research was funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) Insight Development Grant (430-2012-0556).
Publisher Copyright:
© Copyright © 2019 Johnson, Snow, Lawrence and Rainham.
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- General Psychology
PubMed: MeSH publication types
- Journal Article