Reliability and minimal detectable change values for performance-based measures of physical functioning in the canadian longitudinal study on aging

Marla K. Beauchamp, Qiukui Hao, Ayse Kuspinar, Cassandra D'Amore, Giulia Scime, Jinhui Ma, Alexandra Mayhew, Carol Bassim, Christina Wolfson, Susan Kirkland, Lauren Griffith, Parminder Raina

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to determine the relative and absolute reliabilities of 5 key performance-based measures of physical function in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA). Methods: An age-stratified subsample of 147 participants from the CLSA who were undergoing their 3-year data collection visit participated in 2 repeat visits (within 1 week). Participants underwent tests of grip strength, 4-m gait speed, Timed Up and Go (TUG), chair rise, and single-leg stance (left, right, mean, maximum). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), standard error of measurement, and minimal detectable change (MDC) values were calculated. Results: The relative reliability for grip strength was excellent (ICC = 0.95); the TUG and single-leg stance tests had good reliability (ICC = 0.80 or 0.78-0.82, respectively); gait speed and the chair-rise test had moderate reliability (ICC = 0.64 for both) for participants overall. For participants between 50 and 64 years, TUG and gait speed had poor reliabilities (ICC = 0.38 or 0.33, respectively). For participants aged 75 years and older, the single-leg stance had poor reliability (ICC = 0.30-0.39). The MDC90 was about 6 kg for grip strength, 2.3 seconds for TUG, 0.2 m/second for gait speed, 5.2 seconds for chair rise, and ranged from 22.8 to 26.2 seconds for the single-leg stance. Conclusions: Among community-dwelling Canadians older than 50 years, the reliabilities of the CLSA measures were moderate to excellent. The TUG and gait speed in the youngest age group, and the single-leg stance in the oldest age group, showed poor reliability. MDC values can be used to interpret changes over time.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2030-2038
Number of pages9
JournalJournals of Gerontology - Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
Volume76
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 1 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
M.K.B. holds a Tier 2 Canada Research Chair in Mobility, Aging, and Chronic Disease. This research was conducted in collaboration with the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA), specifically the Hamilton Site Data Collection Centre. Funding for the CLSA is provided by the Government of Canada through the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) under grant reference: LSA 94473 and the Canada Foundation for Innovation. The CLSA is led by P.R., C.W., and S.K. P.R. holds the Raymond and Margaret Labarge Chair in Research and Knowledge, is the Director of the McMaster Institute for Research on Aging and the Labarge Centre for Mobility in Aging, and holds a Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Geroscience.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America.

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Ageing
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reliability and minimal detectable change values for performance-based measures of physical functioning in the canadian longitudinal study on aging'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this