Responsiveness of outcome measures used in an antidementia drug trial

Kenneth Rockwood, Paul Stolee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The responsiveness of outcome measures used in antidementia drug trials has had little formal analysis, but it can be crucial to the interpretation of a medication's effectiveness. The authors report the responsiveness of outcome measures from the Canadian trial of linopirdine, a novel phenylinodolinone, estimated using an effect size statistic. The effect sizes ranged from 0.10-0.26, with the cognitive and functional measures yielding estimates greater than 0.20, a level held to be clinically detectable. All of the standard measures used in this trial, save one, performed better than the global clinical measure. The global clinical measure used in this study may have been too insensitive to detect minimal clinical change.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)182-185
Number of pages4
JournalAlzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders
Volume14
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2000

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Gerontology
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Journal Article
  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Responsiveness of outcome measures used in an antidementia drug trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this