Rethinking what counts. Perspectives on wellbeing and genuine progress indicator metrics from a Canadian viewpoint

Jeffrey Wilson, Peter Tyedmers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A prevailing undercurrent of doubt regarding the merits of economic growth has motivated efforts to rethink how we measure the success of economic policy and societal wellbeing. This article comments on efforts to better account for impacts of economic activity emphasizing genuine progress indicator (GPI) and wellbeing metrics from a Canadian viewpoint. The authors caution that GPI and related metrics are measures of human and social welfare and not adequate to account for the ecological costs associated with economic growth. In addition, the article discusses the suitability of wellbeing models and metrics for local scale applications, recognizing growing interest in these techniques at the urban and local level. The article concludes with a reflection on the uptake of GPI and wellbeing measures highlighting the Canadian experience.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)187-202
Number of pages16
JournalSustainability
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Rethinking what counts. Perspectives on wellbeing and genuine progress indicator metrics from a Canadian viewpoint'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this